Tibet Flood

China Authorizes Controversial Hydropower Project in Landslide-Prone Region of Tibet

Natural disaster? What are the chances this disaster will not be recognized as ‘natural’ in Tibet but will be connected to China’s plan to dam https://savetibet.org/chinese-hydropower/ at Motuo

That from the indigenous Tibetans.

Science mumbles about another possibility/probability https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10128990/1/2020TC006618.pdf

Either way, it appears the Chinese might want to consider heeding some paraphrased old marketing advice: it’s not nice to mess with Tibet’s Mother River

Barcelona Protests Invasion

Spain’s far-right group Reconquista joined the pan-European Save Europe Act movement for an anti-migration demonstration in Barcelona on Saturday. Footage shows protesters gathering in Placa de Sant Jaume carrying Spanish flags and unfurling a large banner reading ‘Remigration saves Europe’, while police formed a security line between the rally and an anti-fascist counter-protest.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQD22FC5rgg  

Reconquista spokesperson Toni Estevez said the group wanted to preserve what he described as Europe’s social cohesion, accusing mass migration of threatening European civilisation.

From https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPJDp1vwvRg 

Migrant ‘rape crisis’: Spain ROUNDS UP Ceuta migrants in TENTS as PM PANICS over ‘national security’

Spain has rounded up migrants who were camped out on Ceuta beach and put them in temporary shelter. The move comes after a ‘rape crisis’ was declared following sexual assaults allegedly perpetrated by migrants who had rushed the country’s border with Morocco.

Late to the game but still ahead of US in recognizing the perpetrators of civil dissolution…

Our elites need to be imprisoned for crimes against their own population.

The WEF are behind controlling the politicians for the mass immigrations for all Europe countries.

The most shocking and scary aspect is how none of the journalists are investigating or discussing which elites are controlling the politicians for the mass immigrations for all Europe countries. If it was one or two countries in Europe with mass immigration then it could be just a bad politician… but when it’s almost every country of Europe then clearly evidence of politicians being controlled. Trump is fighting against the mass immigrations within the USA, but even he does not name or discuss the masterminds controlling the politicians in Europe.

Show less

I think that is some plan from Van der Leyen, G. Soros etc… One thing is sure, no one vote for that
Australia & Canada too. It’s orchestrated, obviously.
Mass immigration is done to systematically dilute the religious foundations of countries for the Vatican.
Trump DOES name them. he keeps telling us all about George Soros funding mass migration with that open society. you are wrong. Trump has been naming them for over 10 years the WEF and the UN. he has been fighting with the UN for years. remember when the UN shut down his mic, and turned off the escalator right when he was getting on it? . Trump has been fighting this for 11 years. where have you been??? I watched all his rallies and speeches and he named them all the time. Merkel, Macron, Starmer, Klaus Schwab. Sadiq khan, the EU. Clintons.
I’m a Trump fan and I don’t watch all of his press conferences, but I’ve never heard him name who’s behind the open borders for all 1st world countries. What keyword searches reveal the video where Trump specifically lists the puppet masters behind the open borders in 1st world countries?
They should have been stopped the minute the word “Globalism” was said.
That’s a very simplistic view because the so called ‘puppet masters’ are the top brass of the EU themselves. How exactly are you going to dissolve the European Union ?
there’s only 2 ways that I can think of.. every country starts their own version of Brexit while still agreeing to tariff free trade and adhering to the same manufacturing and product standards (which would be the least painful but longest method) or something like a modern day Guy Fawkes (which would be disruptive to say the least and might just result in same agenda, just different people)

Show less

UPDATE 082726
I have to hand it to the Spanish authorities. They receive a complaint, they will take action; and the invader who made the video is offended.

The Birth of Deep State Part 3

 

This overview from  https://www.loc.gov/collections/early-films-of-new-york-1898-to-1906/articles-and-essays/america-at-the-turn-of-the-century-a-look-at-the-historical-context/? is intended to serve as a  basis of understanding how Western civilization’s relief from the overarching subjugation of the many by the few started with the freedom realized by the Glorious Revolution of 1688 that was re-energized in the American colonies in 1776 and how that relief was turned by the  demands of another revolution, the Industrial Revolution, which triggered the slow displacement of Constitutional protections by the tripartite collaboration of philanthropies, corporations and every level of  political control and is still not finished taking US apart…

This was a time of both confidence and ferment. In the cities and the states, political “Progressives” were coming to power, experimenting with reforms such as women’s suffrage, direct election of United States senators, the initiative, recall, the Australian ballot, primary elections, and laws setting minimum wages, work standards, and regulated rates for common carriers and services. Followers of the Progressive movement believed in the perfectibility of man and his society. It was, said historian Samuel Eliot Morison, “an attempt through government action to curb the arrogance of organized wealth and the wretchedness of poverty amid plenty.” Although McKinley certainly was no Progressive, the movement was on the rise; two of the three presidents who followed him were Progressives: Republican Theodore Roosevelt and Democrat Woodrow Wilson.

Still, if you’re looking for a headlong leap into the nitty-gritty, you’ve come to a better than average starting place.

Starting with the pocket-sized account of Guy Alchon’s “The Invisible Hand of Planning”  a 1983 account of the early 20th Century of business and government efforts to control their anticipated collision with the free but restless citizenry by using their newly developed social science methods of planned control organized, financed and influenced by philanthropists who shoveled it out by the buggy load until it morphed into the shapeless mystery known today as ‘deep state’ and which, as a result of all their pushing,  birthed soulless Technocracy.

Alchon saw their use of the term ‘technocratic’ serving as the science based claim to social authority and policymaking during the social sciences introductory phase.

Before jumping into the tremulous 20th century and beyond we’ll take a look first at the start of our nation’s storied beginnings to see how the 19th Century players side tracked Constitutional governance and more importantly examine the intent of the resets they have inflicted on US since.

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1750-1775/albany-plan

The Albany Plan of Union was instigated from London and to encourage the colonists to express their support  of the New York colony by  showing their presence at the slow moving negotiations between the New York colony and the Mohawk Nation, members of the Iroquois Confederation the British government ordered the colonial officials to meet up in 1754.

The Best Laid Plans…

With the Indian wars looming and France showing their intention to establish their place in the New World’s order of things, the colonies complied with Britains’ orders and used the opportunity to explore cooperative means for their own defense. Benjamin Franklin, a member of the Pennsylvania committee, wasted no time contacting the New York commissioners suggesting a scheme for uniting the northern colonies using an act of Parliament. https://www.nyhistory.org/blogs/benjamin-franklins-plan-for-unification  that included a stated intention to gain an understanding of the wants and needs of the people in order to form a stronger policy of support for them.

The Albany Congress met on June 19th 1754 and unanimously voted to discuss the possibilities of union on June 24th; they adopted a final version on July 10th. The Plan proposed the Union of all colonies except Delaware and Georgia.

The colonial governments killed the plan.

  While the Albany Plan, from it’s inception, was not intended to be a break away vehicle from Great Britain it became the model for the colonist’s  future political endeavors that led to Independence.

https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1700s/Lee-Independence-Resolution/

Resolved, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States, that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved.

That it is expedient forthwith to take the most effectual measures for forming foreign Alliances.

That a plan of confederation be prepared and transmitted to the respective Colonies for their consideration and approbation…

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/articles-of-confederation

The Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress on November 15, 1777. This document served as the United States’ first constitution. It was in force from March 1, 1781, until 1789 when the present-day Constitution went into effect.

After the Lee Resolution proposed independence for the American colonies, the Second Continental Congress appointed three committees on June 11, 1776. One of the committees was tasked with determining what form the confederation of the colonies should take. This committee was composed of one representative from each colony. John Dickinson, a delegate from Delaware, was the principal writer.

The Dickinson Draft of the Articles of Confederation named the confederation “the United States of America.” After considerable debate and revision, the Second Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation on November 15, 1777.

The Articles of Confederation spanned the years of the The American War of Independence https://www.americanrevolutioninstitute.org/exhibition/revolutionary-beginnings-war-and-remembrance-in-the-first-year-of-americas-fight-for-independence/ (1775-1783)

From April 1775 to June 1776, Patriot, Loyalist and British forces clashed in most of the thirteen American colonies, as well as in Canada and the Caribbean. This exhibition explores three of those conflicts — the Battle of Bunker Hill outside Boston (June 1775), the Siege of Quebec in Canada (December 1775) and the Battle of Sullivan’s Island in South Carolina (June 1776), which took place just days before the Declaration of Independence was adopted. Through letters, maps, prints, paintings and artifacts, Revolutionary Beginnings reveals the importance of these under appreciated battles and the extent of the rebellion across the American colonies in its first year. 

https://history.state.gov/milestones/1776-1783/continental-congress

The Continental Congress was the governing body by which the American colonial governments coordinated their resistance to British rule during the first two years of the American Revolution. The Congress balanced the interests of the different colonies and also established itself as the official colonial liaison to Great Britain. As the war progressed, the Congress became the effective national government of the country, and, as such, conducted diplomacy on behalf of the new United States.

In 1774, the British Parliament passed a series of laws collectively known as the Intolerable Acts, with the intent to suppress unrest in colonial Boston by closing the port and placing it under martial law. In response, colonial protestors led by a group called the Sons of Liberty issued a call for a boycott. Merchant communities were reluctant to participate in such a boycott unless there were mutually agreed upon terms and a means to enforce the boycott’s provisions. Spurred by local pressure groups, colonial legislatures empowered delegates to attend a Continental Congress which would set terms for a boycott…

Aside from triggering the Sons of Liberty’s Tea Party the bullying provocations from the British incited a Trump-like Colonial government response known as The Articles of Association.  detailing a planned retaliatory economic response of boycotts and embargoes. Congress even drafted an Olive branch petition as a peaceful path to reconciliation differences. King George, like the IRGC, rejected it and the years dragged on.

Congress and the British government made further attempts to reconcile, but negotiations failed when Congress refused to revoke the Declaration of Independence, both in a meeting on September 11, 1776, with British Admiral Richard Howe, and when a peace delegation from Parliament arrived in Philadelphia in 1778.

Ultimately, the British arrogance led to  Cowpens and within the year to Yorktown, a British surrender and an anticipated American Independence.

The shooting ended but formal peace negotiations would have to wait until after the Confederation Congress took over the reins of government on March 1, 1781…

For US it was the beginning of a long climb to the top of a longer, unexpected and yet to be recognized as the downward slide to perdition.