Category Archives: Uncategorized

Philadelphia democrats Introduced Anti-Constitutional Gun Ban in Pennsylvania Legislature

as the criminal organization promised November 2019.

From ammoland.com

…HB0768 is known as the Firearms Registration Act. The Democrats that introduced the bill were Mary Louise Isaacson (D), Angel Cruz (D), and Mary Jo Daley (D). Last Friday, the General Assembly referred the bill to the committee on judiciary.

…none of the bill’s sponsor(s) responded to our request for comment.

If you prefer a video delivery of the alarming news here is Guns & Gadgets announcement.

When the Clinton’s Said Do It For The Children

normal people knew the children became an endangered species.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, vaccination is highly effective and on-time immunization in children is, “essential because it helps provide immunity before children are exposed to potentially life-threatening diseases.” The CDC says vaccines are tested to ensure that they are safe and effective.

From https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2019/WHO,-Pharma,-Gates.aspx

Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance Marketing Vaccines

The WHO and the U.S. government are founding partners of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. In 2000, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided $750M in seed money to spearhead the creation of Gavi, a public-private partnership and multilateral funding mechanism involving the WHO, governments, the vaccine industry, the World Bank, philanthropic foundations and civil society groups to “improve access to new and underused vaccines for children living in the world’s poorest countries.”

Gavi is headquartered in Geneva with an office in Washington, D.C. that carries out day-to-day operations and one of Gavi’s core goals is to “shape markets for vaccines and other immunization products.”

In 2008, Gavi announced that five countries – Italy, Norway, Canada, the UK and Russia – had joined the Gates Foundation to pledge $1.5B in the Advance Market Commitments (AMC) to accelerate access to pneumococcal vaccines with donors providing up front funding commitments to support vaccine purchase and speed the introduction and use of vaccines in countries partnering with Gavi. Currently, the AMC incentivizes vaccine manufacturers to sign contracts to provide pneumococcal vaccine to developing countries at lower per dose prices and be reimbursed by Gavi funds. By March 2015, Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline had received more than $1B from Gavi’s AMC funds…

Gavi Alliance is a magnet for True Believers on a path worked out for them in their chosen institute of higher learning. Their developing insights gained from working at Gavi and shared at glassdoor reviews are testament to a diversity they, at a still tender age, are recognizing but not yet ready to acknowledge what it represents. Their reviews of the ‘upper level’ reflect the emerging totalitarian future that is breathing down their collectively stiff necks.

…The New York Times editorial headline “How to Inoculate Against Anti-Vaxxers” was a theme repeated in articles reacting to the WHO’s suggestion that people wanting to make informed, voluntary decisions about vaccination are a global menace. One doctor suggested that parents who don’t vaccinate their children are selfish: ”… it’s a matter of ‘I don’t care about other people in the community, I only care about the health and welfare of my own child.’”

…There was no discussion about institutionally acknowledged gaps in vaccine safety science or the fact that most parents dutifully follow the advice of pediatricians and public health officials and only became vaccine safety critics after the risks of vaccination for their children turned out to be 100 percent.No discussion about the fact that since 2011, pharmaceutical companies have no liability for injuries and deaths caused by government recommended and mandated vaccines they sell in the U.S. Instead, parents of vaccine injured children and others concerned about vaccine safety, who for decades have been asking government and industry to produce better quality vaccine science and more humane vaccine policies that respect genetic and biological diversity, were stereotyped as “anti-vaxxers” and demonized as a “threat” to public health.

The Editorial Board of The New York Times explained, “It’s no mystery how we got here. On the internet, anti-vaccine propaganda has outpaced pro-vaccine public health information.” Authoritatively, “the Board, its editor and the publisher” of The New York Times stated that, “Scientists, especially, are uncomfortable with black and white statements, because science is all about nuance. But, in the case of vaccines, there are some hard truths that deserve to be trumpeted. Vaccines are not toxic, and they do not cause autism. Full stop.”

There was no discussion about why people are legitimately concerned about vaccine ingredients and Pharma paying the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to fast track new vaccines to licensure without adequate testing. No discussion about the fact that doctors are giving children 69 doses of 16 vaccines starting on the day of birth – three times as many vaccinations as they got in 1983 – and cannot explain why so many highly vaccinated children in the U.S. are sicker, not healthier today: 1 child in 6 learning disabled and 1 in 40 with autism and millions more suffering with asthma, diabetes, severe allergies, epilepsy, cancer, schizophrenia, depression and other chronic disease marked by chronic inflammation in the body. The CDC states that, “90 percent of the $3.3 trillion in annual health care expenditures are for people with chronic and mental health conditions.” The largely unexplained chronic disease and disability epidemic in the U.S. is bankrupting the U.S. health care system and there is no research being funded to investigate the role that ever increasing numbers of vaccines given to infants, children and adults may be playing…

Along with “anti-vaccine propaganda” there is also plenty of censorship on the internet, too. Which is why you might not have heard about the triplets born into the The McDowell Family in Detroit, Michigan who one by one developed autism the same day they received pneumococcal vaccinations at nine months old.

From CDC pneumococcal opinion

What Are the Possible Side Effects?

Most people who get a pneumococcal vaccine do not have any serious problems with it. With any medicine, including vaccines, there is a chance of side effects. These are usually mild and go away on their own within a few days, but serious reactions are possible.

Mild Problems

Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine

Mild problems following pneumococcal conjugate vaccination can include:
•Reactions where the shot was given ◦Redness
◦Swelling
◦Pain or tenderness

•Fever
•Loss of appetite
•Fussiness (irritability)
•Feeling tired
•Headache
•Chills

Young children who get pneumococcal conjugate vaccine at the same time as inactivated flu vaccine may be at increased risk for seizures caused by fever. Ask your doctor for more information.

Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine

Mild problems following pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination can include:
•Reactions where the shot was given

◦Redness
◦Pain
•Fever
•Muscle aches

If these problems occur, they usually go away within about two days.

Problems that Could Happen After Getting Any Injected Vaccine
•People sometimes faint after a medical procedure, including vaccination. Sitting or lying down for about 15 minutes can help prevent fainting and injuries caused by a fall. Tell your healthcare professional if you or your child: ◦Feels dizzy
◦Has vision changes
◦Has ringing in the ears

•Some people get severe pain in the shoulder and have difficulty moving the arm where the doctor gave the shot. This happens very rarely.
•Any medicine can cause a severe allergic reaction. Such reactions from a vaccine are very rare, estimated at about 1 in a million doses. These types of reactions would happen within a few minutes to a few hours after the vaccination.
•As with any medicine, there is a very remote chance of a vaccine causing a serious injury or death.

For more information on possible side effects, visit CDC’s Possible Side-effects from Vaccines webpage.

About that measles vaccine… https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03-14-measles-being-spread-by-vaccinated-children-research-confirms.html

A team of esteemed researchers from the Bureau of Immunization, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Disease, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) looked at evidence from a 2011 measles outbreak in New York which, as usual, was blamed on the unvaccinated. What they found was that the cause of this particular outbreak was actually a vaccinated person

https://www.sott.net/article/291522-Big-groups-oppose-mandatory-flu-shots-including-American-Medical-Association

From https://www.cochranelibrary.com/

Compared with placebo or do nothing, live attenuated vaccines probably reduced the proportion of children who had confirmed influenza from 18% to 4% (moderate‐certainty evidence), and may reduce ILI from 17% to 12% (low‐certainty evidence). Seven children would need to be vaccinated for one child to avoid influenza, and 20 children would need to prevent one child from experiencing an ILI. We found data from one study that showed similar risk of ear infection in the two groups. There was insufficient information available to assess school absence and parents needing to take time off work. We found no data on hospitalisation, and harms were not consistently reported

All that conflicting information could make a person wonder why so much effort is put into making people participate in a vaccination program with questionable results.

In the end, when you think about it, it all comes down to being Fascist’s slaves.

Don’t you think?

The Democrat Party: Final Power Through Gun Control

We can’t say they didn’t warn US.

As the politicians and their marketers keep US enthralled not walled with the circus like rhetoric they use to talk around this Country’s lack of security, the democrats continue to push their death by disarmament campaign and display their UNcanny ability to pick up republican support as their enslaving America effort marches on UNceasingly.

From https://www.npr.org/2019/02/27/698512397/house-passes-most-significant-gun-bill-in-2-decades

The vote on the first bill, dubbed the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019, passed largely along party lines 240 to 190 with Democrats who control the House cheering as they carried the legislation across the finish line.

A second bill, expected to be taken up Thursday, would extend the period federal authorities have to complete a background check before a gun sale can go through. Under current law, if a check isn’t finalized in three business days, the transaction can automatically proceed

As its name suggests, the first bill did garner modest GOP support, even attracting five Republican co-sponsors. Yet, in the end, only eight Republicans crossed party lines to support the bill.

In a statement John Feinblatt, president of the anti-gun violence group Everytown for Gun Safety, praised lawmakers for “stepping up.”

“We applaud Speaker Pelosi and the bipartisan coalition of House members who supported this bill for stepping up and doing their part to close the giant — and deadly — loopholes in America’s background checks law.”

Here is a list of restricted ‘loopholes’ Feinblatt believes will make the old law new again:

1. An amendment by Mr. Sensenbrenner amending section 3 to add a provision that would exempt from the bill’s background check requirement a transfer to an individual who is the holder of a valid permit to carry a concealed firearm, which has been issued by a state was defeated by a rollcall vote of 13 to 21.

2. An amendment by Mr. Gohmert amending section 3 to add a provision that would exempt the exchange of firearms from the bill’s background check requirement was defeated by a rollcall vote of 12 to 17.

3. An amendment by Mr. Gaetz to require the Attorney General to promulgate regulations to cap the amount a firearms dealer may charge at zero dollars for any transfer for which the background check is not complete within 24 hours and is ultimately approved was defeated by a rollcall vote of 15 to 18.

4. An amendment by Mr. Chabot amending section 3 to add an exemption from the bill’s background check requirement to allow a transfer to a law enforcement officer who is authorized to carry a firearm as part of his employment was defeated by a rollcall vote of 9 to 19.

5. An amendment by Mr. Johnson of Louisiana eliminating from the bill’s background check requirement certain requirements for a temporary transfer of a firearm to qualify under the bill’s exemptions was defeated by a rollcall vote of 11 to 18.

6. An amendment by Mr. Biggs adding a new section to the bill expressing a Sense of Congress that rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution should not be hampered by financial restrictions or constraints on the exercise of those rights; that the exercise of citizens’ Second Amendment rights must not be abridged or restricted
by burdensome payments or delays in the conduct of background checks for lawful firearms transfers; and that financial constraints have no place in the exercise of constitutional rights in that a citizen’s right to bear arms, just like a citizen’s right to vote, must not be qualified by the ability to pay a certain sum of money in order to exercise those rights was defeated by a rollcall vote of 13 to 20.

7. An amendment by Mr. Steube requiring regulations promulgated pursuant to section 922 of title 18, as amended by this measure, to require notification to the field office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the local law enforcement agency, the state law enforcement agency; and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
in the case of a person illegally or unlawfully in the United States was defeated by a rollcall vote of 14 to 20.

8. An amendment by Mrs. Lesko, as amended by Mr. Gaetz, to add an exemption from the bill’s background check requirement for a transfer to a victim of domestic violence or sexual assault who is to be protected under an order of protection issued by a court of law was defeated by a rollcall vote of 15 to 19.

9. An amendment by Mr. Reschenthaler to add an exemption from the bill’s background check requirement for a transfer by an individual who, by his or her own determination, may be a risk to himself or herself or others to a person who is not prohibited by federal law from receiving a firearm was defeated by a rollcall vote
of 15 to 20.

10. An amendment by Mr. Armstrong to add an exemption for a temporary transfer of a firearm for the purpose of hunting, trapping, fishing, ranching, farming, or target practice from the bill’s background check requirement, and eliminating provisions of the temporary transfer section that require transferors to have no reason
to believe that the transferee will use the firearm in a place where that is illegal and the transferor has reason to believe that the transferee will abide by all licensing and permit requirements for such hunting, trapping, and fishing; or the transferee will use the firearm in the transferor’s presence was defeated by a rollcall
vote of 15 to 23.

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW MADE BY THE BILL, AS REPORTED

In compliance with clause 3(e) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, changes in existing law made by the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new matter is printed in italic, and existing law in which no change is proposed is shown in
roman):

Additionally, section 3 would authorize the Attorney General to promulgate any necessary regulations to implement this legislation.

Promulgate. Democrats use that word to convince people they are required to give the democrats their brains first then their balls and then their money. Not necessarily in that order nor Constitutional.

Here is the link to https://www.congress.gov/116/crpt/hrpt11/CRPT-116hrpt11.pdf. I suggest you scroll on down to the Dissenting Views portion first. It’s about 3/4’s of the way down the page. You can’t miss it.

The opposition’s views make me believe they are not the kind of Republicans who will side with the democrats when the time comes. The democrats planned attack on the Second Amendment is one I’m certain they have much faith in and the Republican reach-a-rounds will, after their phony BS soul-searching, announce they, in good conscience, are willing to stab the citizens in the back once more and support the weapons collection.

Read it. This new gun control act is phonier than Boeing’s ‘we like social justice warriors’ flight enticements. I’m figuring the democrats are going to stage their background psychotic events again and again as the new wave, newly elected Soros leftists introduce increasingly draconian gun laws in, excuse the pun, rapid fire succession injecting higher levels of mayhem into the process until their demands are acceptable to the RINO’s who will finally respond to the bipartisan dog whistle and sell this Country down the river faster than an Ethiopian landing.

Just trying to get up to speed with the enemy.

Michelle’s Former Aide Asks State Attorney To Help Smollett

Tina Tchen, Chief of Staff to the First Lady and Executive Director, White House Council on Women and Girls reaches out to the Obamas on behalf of her friend, Jurnee Smollett-Bell

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/illinois/articles/2019-03-13/cook-county-prosecutor-suggested-smollett-probe-go-to-fbi

From https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/jussie-smollett-update-kim-foxx-texts-emails-507107451.html

New documents showing text messages and email chains revealed Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx’s asked Supt. Eddie Johnson to turn the Jussie Smollett investigation over to the FBI before she recused herself from the case…

What’s the Democrat Machine Hiding Now?

This college admissions scam and the Alan Dershowitz expectation of it gaining “Great Scandal” standing with only a very weak supporting cast of Hollywood folk was a puzzlement for me. It turns out there is, under all that democrat detritus, a stench after all.

Because it brought to mind a Clinton administration attack on the U.S. Constitution I recently learned about, I’ll relate that story first. Remember, never let a crisis, even an unknown one, go to waste.

While upsetting to academics, the Fifth Circuit’s 1996 court ruling on Hopwood v Texas found that different admission policies for blacks, whites and browns are unconstitutional.

One angry Clinton bureaucrat, Norma V Cantu, threatened to cut off Federal funds if Texas state universities complied with that law.

Although I am old enough to remember a Clinton axis member’s attack of that magnitude on our liberty, for some reason it’s not familiar. Maybe the media failed to take note of it’s rejection.

Because you may be having the same problem recalling that story here’s a refresher from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/03/the-office-for-civil-rights-volatile-power/519072/

When George H. W. Bush took office, it initially looked as if he would continue his predecessor’s neglect of the OCR. The assistant secretary for civil rights position was left empty for over a year, but when Michael L. Williams was confirmed, he set a new tone by meeting with civil-rights groups. He declared that he would use compliance reviews to enforce the law, review policies put in place by the previous administration, make certain the office would be more transparent, and request more funding for the OCR. He had “determined upon [his] arrival that insufficient resources had been devoted to the performance of critical legal, policy, and enforcement activities.”

Williams soon lost the goodwill he earned. At the end of 1990, he declared that scholarships based on race were illegal. He did so without approval from the Bush administration and ignited furor among college administrators and civil-rights groups. Williams’s credibility was lost, and he accomplished little during the rest of his tenure. When Richard Riley, Bill Clinton’s secretary of education, took over the department, he declared that race-exclusive scholarships were legal as long as they were intended to increase diversity or redress past discrimination.

Riley took over an office that had been largely written off by much of the civil-rights community. When Norma V. Cantu, who had been a lawyer for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, became the assistant secretary for civil rights in 1993, she told a reporter, “Staff have told me some stories about how in previous administrations, civil rights had not been dealt with in a serious manner.” She accused her predecessor of leaving the extant cases in a “state of disarray.”

A self-professed and proud “product of affirmative action,” Cantu pushed the office to be more proactive. She was accused, at the time of her appointment, by one conservative opponent of “having a zeal for social engineering.” Under her direction, the OCR undertook more investigations and broadened its scope. Instead of investigating only the schools that were the directs targets of a complaint, the office investigated the whole district and the whole state. Sounding like the critics of the Obama administration, The Weekly Standard complained at the time, “If Congress doesn’t check Norma Cantu’s runaway leftism, it won’t really be fair to complain that she holds herself above the law. Congress will have decided: Ms. Cantu is the law.”

That sounds mii-tee familiar, dontcha think? Leftist just don’t have an acceptable bone in their body when it comes to recognizing other people rights.

Speaking of rights, back to the stench mentioned early on…

Big Law Dealmaker Charged in the National College Admissions Scandal.

Some key information

Rick Springer’s LinkedIn page alleges he’s a stonemason but the closest connection to Rick Springer, stonemason, I could find after a search was a reference to a mason shown preparing a “springer” stone to cap the center pier.

As for me… a happy ending! Even if it turns out to be a fairy tale.

You have to scroll down even though it says “Cannot connect” otherwise you’ll miss the happy ending.

No Wonder Jack Anderson Called It the Washington Merry-Go-Round

What goes around, comes around.

During George Webb’s nine minute summary of the University of Virginia’s role in the proliferation of nuclear science applications Webb pointed out that a high level go between was needed to, in effect, establish the perceived need for a balance of power.

Perhaps no one fit that role better than Armand Hammer.

And guess what.

Hammer’s favorite politician was a democrat