The 6/17/20 Canada Free Press headline read “United Nations Now Muscling In On U.S. Police Reform”. Using that theme, editor Judi McCleod wove fact and semi-fiction into an allusion that the UN wizard behind the Blue Curtain is UNidentifiable, UNaccountable and therefore UNtouchable to the once again confounded Patriots of America.
While the silent majority’s collective S-2 contemplates the reality of the current democrat based turmoil let’s examine Ms McCleod’s effort to mask the higher ranking villains.
…“A huge part of the problem in trying to fight off ownership by Agenda 21 are the multiple names and descriptions for it and the tons of U.N. paper produced to keep it recycled through the countless bureaucrats in villages, towns and cities.
“A veritable moving target that never goes away, Agenda 21 has more pages and as many clauses as the unread Health Bill known as ObamaCare.
“Some day when historians are sifting through the ashes of what was once the Free West trying to determine what happened, they will discover that freedom was lost through ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’.
“It was always difficult for the masses to catch on to the game-plan with the U.N. masquerading as ‘Grand Peace Central’.
“Though word leader lemmings and the U.N. have turned citizen suspicion of the all-encompassing Agenda 21 into conspiracy theory, ‘The Agenda That Wasn’t Really There’ is the world’s most clear and present danger.
“As patriots try to define it, the U.N. continues to change it just as the far left keeps moving the goal posts…
If the point of that piece is supposed to give the reader a clearer understanding of what’s being played out it misses its mark. The goalposts don’t have to move; the perception of them moving works well enough. Type Rockefeller Foundation and whatever organization McCleod mentions in that article into a search engine if you want to grasp the basis of the manipulation. It shouldn’t take too long to remove any doubt about where the ‘jelly on the wall’ is coming from and how it got there. The enabling smoke and accompanying mirrors built into the Agenda whatever programs could be explained with greater clarity when the behavioral science impinging on the vitality of our civilization is better understood.
Read the BBC’s explanation of their baffle ’em with BS primer at https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200406-why-smart-people-believe-coronavirus-myths and compare it with what’s being offered here.
Their subject, smart people who believe Covid-19 is a hoax, is a good starting point. The coronavirus announcement back on March 15 told the world ‘War is an appropriate analogy’. There are at least two reasons for that analogy; firstly, it’s made a lot of money for people who know how to use the proper inflections when they want to impress the impressionable semi-unwashed and secondly, Tavistock Clinic, mother ship of the bafflenet is also home of the psychology of war.
In the event you are not familiar with Tavistock Institute, themilleniumreport can bring you up to date. The short outline that follows should satisfy the less patient.
During the early days of WW II, Britain was having a difficult time raising a large land army. The Tavistock Institute of Medical Psychology (Tavistock Clinic) offered to help. Being recognized as vital components of the still emerging field of psychiatry and remembered for their skill in establishing acceptance of the claimed discovery that neurotic disabilities were not strictly related to the stresses of World War I, the Clinic was invited to join the Directorate of Army Psychiatry. The entire staff accepted.
The Tavistock Clinic, founded in 1920, was the parent body of the WW II Institute. The founding group was comprised of general physicians, neurologists, psychologists, anthropologists and psychiatrists; all, from the beginning of the group’s formation, showed willingness to link up to the social sciences.
Their staff philosophy was based on a belief in tolerance of their different viewpoints; it lined the path to mission success when there was only developing knowledge to build on. Tavistock Clinic was positioning itself as the clearing house of diverse conclusions extracted from their compatriot’s opinions. One might conclude they were making it up as they went along. Or perhaps they were comfortable with another expression; if it doesn’t fit, force it.
The Tavistock Clinic’s recognition as being a center of cutting edge New Thought was the enticement that enabled the True Believing crème de la crème of the world’s progressive thinkers to believe it was their right and duty to reshape the world in their image as it developed.
How were we to know they would be coming at US hammer and tong?
Science of Coercion… Copyright 1994
Defining Psychological War… Christopher Simpson
Page 7
… Psychological warfare’s role in the evolution of communication research must be examined in the context of political developments of the 1940’s and 1950’s. In truth, the primary object of U.S. psychological operations during this period was to frustrate the ambitions of radical movements in resource-rich developing countries seeking solutions to the problems of poverty, dependency, and entrenched corruption…
…The United States and the Soviet Union clashed repeatedly over geopolitical hot spots around the world, and the Soviets conducted a large and reasonably sophisticated psychological warfare campaign against the United States…
Page 8
Given this situation, many leading U.S. social scientists regarded U.S. psychological warfare programs as an enlightened and relatively peaceful means of managing international conflicts through measures short of all-out war. As Ithiel de Sola Pool argued, social scientists’ active participation in U.S. foreign policy initiatives was necessary because the “mandarins of the future”– Pool’s term of praise for the decision making elite– need a “way of perceiving the consequences of what they do if [their] actions are not to be brutal, stupid and bureaucratic but rather intelligent and humane. The only hope for humane government in the future,” he continued, “is through extensive use of the social sciences by the government.”
In reality, though, U.S. and Soviet psychological warfare programs each fed its rival’s appetite for escalated conflicts, particularly in contested countries in the Third World. Scientific research programs on either side that claimed to be a defensive reaction to foreign intrigues were easily interpreted in the rival’s camp as aggressive preparations for war.
At heart modern psychological warfare has been a tool for managing empire, not for settling conflicts in any fundamental sense. It has operated largely as a means to ensure that indigenous democratic initiatives in the Third World and Europe did not go “too far” from the standpoint of U.S. security agencies. Its primary utility has been its ability to suppress or distort unauthorized communication among subject peoples, including domestic U.S. dissenters who challenged the wisdom or morality of imperial policies. In practice modern psychological warfare and propaganda have only rarely offered “alternatives” to violence over the medium-to-long term. Instead, they have been an integral part of a strategy and culture whose premise the rule of the strong at the expense of the weak, where coercion and manipulation pose as “communication” and close off opportunities for other, more genuine, forms of understanding. The problem with psychological warfare is not so much the content of individual messages: It is instead its consistent role as an instrument for maintaining grossly abusive social structures, notably in global North/South relations.
The promised new world order was refining it’s newest strategy: Domination by communication. How did they manage to take US this far? What did Hillery and Barack used to say? You can’t deconstruct a village all by yourself? Something like that; they and their friends only look like movers and shakers.
All BO did in this case, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/15/executive-order-using-behavioral-science-insights-better-serve-American, was to serve as the one small heel for globalists who took one giant step back on mankind.
Few people show any indication of being aware of the current political parties determination to have the Will of the People transferred over to a ‘to be named when needed’ bureaucratic committee that will eventually be found in a UN enclave.
An example of the political will; from the Obama whitehouse archives linked above:
Section 1. Behavioral Science Insights Policy Directive.
(a) Executive departments and agencies (agencies) are encouraged to:
(i) identify policies, programs, and operations where applying behavioral science insights may yield substantial improvements in public welfare, program outcomes, and program cost effectiveness;
(ii) develop strategies for applying behavioral science insights to programs and, where possible, rigorously test and evaluate the impact of these insights;
(iii) recruit behavioral science experts to join the Federal Government as necessary to achieve the goals of this directive; and
(iv) strengthen agency relationships with the research community to better use empirical findings from the behavioral sciences.
(b) In implementing the policy directives in section (a), agencies shall:
(i) identify opportunities to help qualifying individuals, families, communities, and businesses access public programs and benefits by, as appropriate, streamlining processes that may otherwise limit or delay participation — for example, removing administrative hurdles, shortening wait times, and simplifying forms;
(ii) improve how information is presented to consumers, borrowers, program beneficiaries, and other individuals, whether as directly conveyed by the agency, or in setting standards for the presentation of information, by considering how the content, format, timing, and medium by which information is conveyed affects comprehension and action by individuals, as appropriate;
(iii) identify programs that offer choices and carefully consider how the presentation and structure of those choices, including the order, number, and arrangement of options, can most effectively promote public welfare, as appropriate, giving particular consideration to the selection and setting of default options; and
(iv) review elements of their policies and programs that are designed to encourage or make it easier for Americans to take specific actions, such as saving for retirement or completing education programs. In doing so, agencies shall consider how the timing, frequency, presentation, and labeling of benefits, taxes, subsidies, and other incentives can more effectively and efficiently promote those actions, as appropriate. Particular attention should be paid to opportunities to use nonfinancial incentives.
Hacked, Tracked and Hijacked: The Cabalistic Driven American Migration from Peace and Prosperity.
Where did the idea of merging behavioral science with political science come from? The short answer is Great Britain. The larger, more complex answer is rooted within this bit of history rarely mentioned…
With WW II winding down, Alan Gregg the Rockefeller Foundation Medical Director offered a proposition to the alleged low on funds Clinic to carry on an implementation of the kind of social psychiatry that the army developed during the war. The Foundation’s intended target, however, was post-war society. The agreed on transformation and redefined mission of Tavistock was identified as Operation Phoenix.
A major payoff involving Tavistock and the Rockefeller Foundation involves one of the most distinguished psychologist’s of the Twentieth Century Kurt Lewin. While Organization Development is still generally attributed to Lewin, a 1945 document (abstract below) identifies Tavistock as the originator of OD’s invention.
If you choose not to skip over https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Lewin you will be rewarded with an insight into what the covid-19 sham is about and why a goodly portion of the United States of America believe the crap spewed by the criminal democrats.
From https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00076791.2013.790368
The management field ‘Organization Development’ (OD), is said to have been invented in the mid-1950s in the USA. Some contribution post-1958 by the UK Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (TIHR), and to a minor extent, in its World War II ‘group-relations’ work is acknowledged. Otherwise, OD depicts the circle of its US ‘founding father’ Kurt Lewin (1890–1947) as its historic mainspring. A new 1945 primary source, the TIHR’s originating funding proposal to the Rockefeller Foundation, proposes all the components of OD, outside mention of Lewin et al. Thus, what was to become OD was invented in the Britain of 1945, not the USA of the 1950s.
What the U.S. sector of the world’s reptilian elite did launch in Washington D.C. was the monumental shift in the role of the United States: President Truman’s confirmation on 27 January 1948 of an Act of Congress which, ‘for the first time in our history committed our government, in time of peace, to conduct international information and educational exchange activities on a world-wide, long-term scale.
The Pursuit of the Nazi Mind pg189
Daniel Pick
Harry S Truman. Just another democrat doing what the elite approve.
One more thing. The United Nations headquarters in New York City sits on 16 acres of land purchased with an $8 million donation made in 1946 by John D. Rockefeller Jr.
I’d expect someone leading a ‘UN out of US’ cheer would make that kind of information abundantly clear. You know, so the reader has some idea of the chances of his/her demands meaning anything.
Chaos on Order
https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/512-the-new-face-of-psychiatry
https://www.bucksafa11.org/2019/05/24/behavioral-science-proves-white-man-can-be-tamed/
http://blog.wellcomelibrary.org/2016/09/social-science-in-action-reports-from-tavistock-institute-archive/.
