If there was one thing I’d change about the American character it is our inability to listen to politicians, technocratic front men and willing media stooges without demanding proof of their integrity. Based on the 20th Century performance of the aforementioned social pilings the future they sell rarely benefits the citizenry as much as it benefits those pushing for change and the actual results delivered oft-times involves hidden crimes against US of one degree or another.
I was looking for a literary example of a political criminal the other day when I clicked on the following scholarly commons website. Halfway through the nine pages of “The Concept of the Political Criminal” I began to see myself as a suspect. Don’t laugh. You might feel the same way if you read it.
https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5732&context=jclc
I also read the March 24, 2020 inquiry to Rachael Leonard, Chief FOIA Officer, Office of Science and Technology Policy from the Electronic Privacy Information Center regarding any responses to a March 19, 2020 letter from Senator Ed Markey asking about any White House plans to use Americans’ location data with the federal government’s COVID-19 response1 and learned…
To combat the health crisis, the U.S. government has sought the assistance of technology companies. On March 11, 2020, U.S. Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios convened meetings with tech companies including Apple, Cisco, Google, IBM, Microsoft, Twitter, and Facebook.4 Kratsios stated, “[c]utting edge technology companies and major online platforms will play a critical role in this all-hands-on-deck effort.”5 For example, Amazon, at a recent White House meeting, argued that its cloud computing tools could help federal authorities in tasks such as tracking travelers.6
The Washington Post also reported that government officials are speaking with tech companies, such as Facebook, Apple, and Google, about how the government can use cell phone location data to combat coronavirus.7 In a private meeting on March 15, 2020, a coronavirus task force represented by tech executives, entrepreneurs, and investors discussed ideas about disease mapping and telehealth.8 According to the Washington Post reporting, smartphone location data may help officials map the spread of infection, predict the next hotspots, or decide where to allocate health resources.9 According to an OSTP official, the government is “encouraged by American technology companies looking to leverage aggregated, anonymized data to glean key insights for covid-19 modeling efforts.”10…
but I never learned the answer to EPICs question about any plans the White House had with technocrats.
What happened was in my searching I got distracted by https://inclusivescicomm.org/files/State-of-Inclusive-SciComm-2020-2.pdf, another piece of the reason for Reset puzzle. It may be key to what Fauci and his gang use to communicate; a modern version of ixnay on the flubay secret science Tower of Babel gobbledee-gook being sold as part of the ‘Why Every Person Needs to Feel Wanted In the New World Order If They Survive the Transition’ set. A sample:
While there is a growing recognition of the value and urgency of inclusive approaches, there is little documented knowledge about the potential catalysts and barriers for this work. Without documentation, synthesis, and critical reflection, the movement cannot proceed as quickly as is warranted.
Sounds like a Gen-Xer explaining why millennials can’t find the head if it involves more than one right turn off the main corridor.
I shouldn’t joke. These people take themselves seriously and that does not bode well for a country where a) an increasing percentage of the population exhibits little understanding of why all minds are a terrible thing to waste and b) it is difficult for citizens to comprehend that there are multiple definitions for spine.
Inclusive science communication (ISC) is a new and broad term that encompasses all efforts to engage specific audiences in conversations or activities about science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) topics, including, but not limited to, public engagement, informal science learning, journalism, and formal science education. Unlike other approaches toward science communication, however, ISC research and practice is grounded in inclusion, equity, and intersectionality, making these concerns central to the goals, design, implementation, evaluation, and refinement of science communication efforts. Together, the diverse suite of insights and practices that inform ISC comprise an emerging movement.
What that sounds like is a convincing argument that Idiocracy was predictive programming and dumbing down science as part of the American reset is official.
Remember this?
“In our dream we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science. We are not to raise up among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply.” – Frederick T Gates circa 1913.
Does anyone think we’d be steadily slipping under the swamp if we had a string of American leaders with the strong moral resolve Frederick T Gates provided John D Rockefeller on our side to counter the political jokers we’ve followed throughout our history? Does anyone who has lived through the post WW2 boom and decline think we can prevail over adversity without God’s blessings and protection?
Another recent subject in the news was BlackRock taking over and/or redirecting the home buying market into a forced peasantry for most of today’s middle class offspring. Whether that BlackRock story is something to be concerned about, I don’t know but no one indicated anything was amiss last year when Bloomberg published this BlackRock news. Stories like that and this next one portend a very real and immediate problem for our Constitutional protection as we languish in the deep pool of stupid the regulators control.
https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-lefts-top-dark-money-empires-brought-in-1-7-billion-in-2019/
However loathsome you might find the information Capital Research provided in that article there is a group who has for over a hundred years worked towards the transitioning of the United States away from its foundations and has paved the way for modern dark money groups and the neuroscience advances that appear to be a central focus powering the approaching reset.
Which leads to the closing observation…
A few weeks ago some people appeared to be having a good time attaching magnets to their inoculation sites thereby gaining a measure of youtube fame.
That might qualify as positive feedback for some but while they and their inoculated brethren might think they’ve passed the danger zone because they’re still walking the earth, they have not yet gained a greater appreciation of the breadth and scope of the experiment they volunteered for.
Here’s a video they will want to watch, especially the content after the three minute mark. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nb07TLkJ3Ww%3c/A. I thought it also provides a little more incite (sic) on Fauci and friend’s two year experiment. That MIT video was made almost eight years ago but there is more recent input to help better comprehend their intentions.
Wikipedia is good for the basics but this Guardian article should give the magnetized celebrants something to think about at least for a little while.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/neurophilosophy/2015/mar/24/remote-control-brain-activity-nanoparticles
Unfortunately, it wasn’t idle curiosity that caused them to stumble onto the magnetized nano particles applications, they’ve been working on it for quite a while.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/neurophilosophy/2016/mar/24/magneto-remotely-controls-brain-and-behaviour
Whoops! Does that say ‘remotely controls brain and behaviour’?
Why would anybody in their right mind want to go there?
More to the point of the opening paragraph, why would anybody want to cooperate with those seeking such power without seriously questioning them?
