or shading fraud into respectability is easy if you make the laws.
If only the world paid heed to Freemason Sir Walter Scott’s catchy phrase, “Oh! What a Tangled Web We Weave/When First We Practice to Deceive!” our favorite 21st Century phrase might not be “Lock her up, Lock her up”.
Scott’s Marmion, from which his catchy phrase emanated was published in 1808. It was a time when few of the challenges resulting from the change enveloping 18th Century England and brought on by the Industrial Revolution were being satisfactorily addressed on a matching scale.
The message served as a reminder to the social strata of England that lying was still understood to have a complex and destructive effect on society.
In modern America, such complexities have been long dismissed through distraction, fear and willing submission to evil. Political criminals won that battle long ago. Here’s an example of what that cost America.
You like your job? You can keep your job. But you gotta get a flu shot
You’ve heard the term Pay to Play, right?
While it’s not uncommon for donors to receive political appointments, the Obama administration has been criticized for doling out an unusually large number over the years. Unqualified appointees could constitute a violation of the Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, which prohibits appointments from being made on a purely financial basis.
That’s from the Washington Examiner. Oh, and nothing happened to the criminals.
The democrats call out any hint of Republican pay to play and I pass it on. Just so you understand my equal opportunity susceptibilities can stand up to any scrutiny.
Let’s get back to our Georgia nurse friend’s observation about the Obamacare connection to forced vaccination and what purpose it serves.
We’ve already established that the Democrats aren’t afraid of any ramifications of breaking the law and I’ll bet the only person in D.C. who has not uttered the term ‘pay to play’ in an investigatory manner is named Mueller.
But what is this? A curious application of ‘pay to play’? it says
…The only question is how much the Democrats got in exchange for gutting the government’s ability to control health care costs.
During the campaign, this was Obama’s position:
Obama will allow Americans to buy their medicines from other developed countries if the drugs are safe and prices are lower outside the U.S. Obama will also repeal the ban that prevents the government from negotiating with drug companies, which could result in savings as high as $30 billion. (for the drug companies) my interpretation.
It no longer appears on the health care page at mybarackobama.com.
But, let’s do the math. In ten years, $30 billion a year would mean $300 billion in savings. The deal cut by the White House is for $80 billion in savings. So the pharmaceutical industry gets to keep $220 billion for the low low price of $150 million in August to pass health care reform so Rahm Emanual won’t be 13-1.
A hundred fifty million for two hundred twenty billion in savings: an excellent return on investment by anyone’s standards.
It is evident from the news stories above that a democrat will do anything for money.
Additional model being the Clinton Arkansas cartel when AIDs tainted blood collected from Arkansas prisons was sold to Canada.
Our nurse points out on her video that the Federal Government mandates all health care workers get vaccinated with the worthless flu shot.
Could it be that mandate was part of the pharmaceutical industry’s arrangement they made at every level of government? Did congressional, executive and judicial malfeasance result in a multi-million dollar kick back of taxpayers funds assuring everyone’s silence and cooperation and Americans being used as guinea pigs and worse, vessels for disposal of worthless product?
What? You didn’t think your failure to take action wouldn’t lead those criminals to commit such crimes against US? As it was pointed out in the nurse’s video all the employees had to do was refuse the vaccination; an action their masters were concerned about.
Maybe you would prefer a one and done application. It’s heading our way.
… researchers involved in the development of I.G.T. believe that it could provide long-term protection against diseases which traditional vaccines have failed to control. Smile when they tell you they are doing it for the children.
“This will greatly help the ethical use of non-human primates for biomedical purposes.”
You probably believe this has nothing to do with cloning monkeys
In a 2017 speech calling for federal legalization, U.S. Senator Cory Booker said that “states [that have legalized marijuana] are seeing decreases in violent crime.” He was wrong.
The first four states to legalize marijuana for recreational use were Colorado and Washington in 2014 and Alaska and Oregon in 2015. Combined, those four states had about 450 murders and 30,300 aggravated assaults in 2013. Last year, they had almost 620 murders and 38,000 aggravated assaults—an increase of 37 percent for murders and 25 percent for aggravated assaults, far greater than the national increase, even after accounting for differences in population growth.
Nah. Politicians don’t lie. They’re looking out for US. We trust them. That’s why we don’t vote in the primary elections.
