All posts by jr.ohmage@proton.me

Blind Soldiers of NWO March On

A Townhall.com article reported today that “Congressman Ro Khanna (D-CA) claimed Tuesday there were no embassy protests or deaths of American contractors under the Obama administration.

Now, everybody knows that’s a lie but reading that article could not have been timed better. It nudged me into looking at Obama era posts where I found a good ol’ ‘smoking gun’ reference. Ah, those were the days.

The link to frontpage does not work. Use http://shoebat.com/2014/05/03/distribution-list-smoking-gun-benghazi-email-included-muslim-brotherhood-agent/ if you want to get the pertinents.

The Benghazi Mayekar/Alhassani/Obama connection was one notable embassy protest that comes to mind. Samir Mayekar moved on to https://www.chicagobusiness.com/government/citys-economic-development-czar-takes-tricky-balancing-act and Mehdi K. Alhassani of https://twitter.com/mehdi3344?lang=en fame, who… a few hours before the Benghazi attack, Alhassani met in the White House with Samir Mayekar, a George Soros ‘fellow’ for an unscheduled visit…

Here’s some Sharia financing information you might find interesting.

http://gulfbusiness.com/2014/03/bahrain-eyes-external-sharia-audits-islamic-banks/#.VGqdnyx0z-g

February 2011, out of concern that foreign commercial banks that previously submitted to sharia law were mixing Islamic banking activities and conventional banking activities Qatar ordered non-islamic banks close their Islamic finance divisions in Qatar by the end of the year

http://www.businessinsider.com/qatar-banks-sharia-law-2011-2

Six months prior to that announcement, the Qatar Central Bank issued new rules that effectively gave conventional banks that opened sharia compliant windows a choice: Full submission to sharia banking methods or be limited to conventional banking activities.

To appreciate the sharia arm twisting behind the new rules, one only has to understand “The estimated 15-20% annual growth rate of Islamic services has encouraged conventional banks to open sharia-compliant windows in recent years and the new rules will therefore have a significant impact on their growth. Islamic finance has been an important driver in attracting new customers. Islamic assets among the country’s banks grew at an average of 54.3% between 2003 and 2010, compared to 37.8% in conventional assets over the same period, according to MEED.”

That quote is from http://www.oxfordbusinessgroup.com/news/qatar-new-rules-islamic-banking

Major corporations that consider themselves sharia compliant in one fashion or another, in other words corporations not yet faced with the choice of a short knife elimination from a perceived expanding market or a full commitment to sharia compliance include: Bank of America, Barclays, Bloomberg, Century21, J.P. Morgan Chase and even Coca Cola.

The longer but probably incomplete list can be read at http://www.shariahfinancewatch.org/blog/shariah-financial-institutions/

Palantir and Sharia compliant Financial corporations… put them together and what do you get?

A Well Regulated Militia Questionnaire

Anything for the cause. I put this together back when the Obama crowd was getting pushy about armed citizenry.

A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

1) Do you believe the County Sheriff is the highest ranking LEO in your county?

O yes O no

2) Do you believe the County Sheriff owes primary allegiance to the State/Federal Government?

O yes O no

3) Do you believe it is acceptable for the County Sheriff to avoid publicly declaring an allegiance to the Second Amendment?

O yes O no

4) Do you believe the concept of holding politicians feet to the fire improves their character and level of respect for constituents?

O yes O no

5) Do you think voting a non-performing, Constitutional disrespecting politician out of office would improve your and your family’s life and well-being?

O yes O no

6) Do you believe the Second Amendment empowers you to join or start a militia group?

O yes O no

7) Do you think a County militia is relevant in the Twenty-first Century?

O yes O no

8) If you said yes to question #7, do you think there is any difference between a Sheriff’s posse and a militia?

O yes O no

9) If you said no to question #8, would you be willing to join a Sheriff’s posse to resist State/Federal gun registration or collection?

O yes O no

10) Do you think Sheriff would ever, if the need arose, call for a posse to resist any egregious State/Federal action contrary to our Constitution?

O yes 0 hell yes O no O Hell no

Games

Having once again come across an article where the democrats accused the White House of the democrat party’s favorite activity, playing games in a most dangerous fashion, I thought it was time to look into the somehow empowered democrats propensity of using their political energy weapons in the most domestic of fashions while they express horror at any actions their opposition party takes that appear to defend US from foreign enemies the democrats helped birth.

My effort paid off by providing an unexpected introduction to Nawal El- Saadawi and I consider it a blessing when I encounter a truth delivered like the arrival of the eye of a category five hurricane.

Nancy Pelosi’s hammer should be so powerful.

Other weekend reading provided enlightenment from a different direction by Burton L Visotzky who explained the emergence of “rabbinic Judaism”, a form of Judaism that emerged from the rubble of the Herodian Temple and in his words was “shaped and defined by rabbis” using vocal transmissions of what the rabbis called their “Oral Torah” that lead to a Judaism that replaced the Israelite Temple religion.

If one thought about it one might see the similarity in the way our Constitution took a mortal hit from the Patriot Act after the takedown of the World Trade Center and the ready adaptation of rabbinic Judaism after the Romans destroyed their temple in 70 CE; as Rabbi Visotzky put it, “In short, what is now called “Judaism” was invented in the matrix of Roman culture.”

What’s more of a concern for US is the recent proclamation about special status being provided Jews and the daily news media accounts of people arrested for verbally assaulting Jewish people.

You see, when the rabbis were developing the oral tradition they were also giving their own interpretation of Scripture, an effort intended to replace the Temple as the source of authority. While modern rabbis retain that authority they also are assuming the mantle the recent status of special provides and that adds a whiff of the infallibility the Roman/Jesuit pope is in the process of casting away.

While some may celebrate the likely end of the Roman Church’s reign, one important thought to remember is the Church foundation was always presented as based on the teachings of Jesus who made clear the difference between right and wrong and the origins and the consequences of each.

Rabbinical Judaism presents moral leadership as equivocating virtue without value. Regularly. An Outback society of no rules just rights. And that, my friend, just leads to a walk to the locker room

When You Get Down To It…

there is nothing new.

Getting back to that USMCA scheme. I was introduced to a new concept the other night, Shared Sovereignty. It does not compute for me so I looked it up and found this necklace of black pearl wisdom, https://www.academia.edu/2763366/Shared_Sovereignty_and_the_European_Union_The_Transition_to_Post-Westphalian_Sovereignty by one Gabriel Reznick who clarified things for me with his conclusion:

This essay explored the transition from Westphalian Sovereignty to post-Westphalian Sovereignty. In order to do so I looked at the EU as a supranational state, and through analyzing the treaties, we can see the creation of this supranational state. One of the main elements that is stressed in this essay is the importance of shared sovereignty relating to the EU. In order to belong to the EU the member states had to give up some of their sovereignty, which would be transferred to the different EU institutions. But the member states still have some sovereignty and in order to create new laws compromise has to be made between the EU member states and the EU institutions. In order to explain the transition from Westphalian to post-Westphalian sovereignty, this paper used security as a case study. By looking at the new threats in this global world, we can see that transition, security is changing from territorial security to more global security, worrying less about their borders and more about terrorism. The EU challenges the Westphalian model because it shows an alternate route, that has proved affective in this global world.

Please, study that conclusion while I go look for the Westphalian information. It’s important.

OK. Since the transition out of the Westphalian model is allegedly proving effective for the EU that Westphalian model must have been a real bite because if I was called to witness for the EU the nicest thing I could say it’s a real fluster cu…yeah, that. But not remembering specifics about the Seventeenth century I needed a refresh and took a short course at https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-hccc-worldhistory/chapter/the-peace-of-westphalia-and-sovereignty/. It’s free, shorter than my memory and worth the detour.

If you won’t go, this is what grabbed my attention:

The European colonization of Asia and Africa in the 19th century and two global wars in the 20th century dramatically undermined the principles established in Westphalia.

That grabbed my attention because the two global wars in the 20th century dramatically undermined the Westphalian principles. If that makes no sense to you look up Albert Pike and three world wars.

The modern effort to replace the Westphalian principle that recognizes State sovereignty and established the foundations of the free world does not bode well for Western Civilization as we know it.

Do you want to rely on globalist word games to provide your sovereignty? Security is changing from territorial to global? For who? How many Frenchies, Brits or Germans are dead now because the EU turned into a welcoming continent with an asterisk that explained the ‘refugees’ might take some time to acclimate to our way of life.

The post-Westphalian world is wrapping it’s tentacles around US, my friend, and the House of Representatives has already embraced the squid. There might still be time to convince the Senate we’re not interested.

Wait a minute, you might be thinking. This is a trade treaty. Yes it is. And this https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2588074/ is a WTO paragraph that says:

Measures

Trade rules apply only to government actions. In trade treaties these actions are called measures, a term that includes legislation, regulations, rules, procedures, decisions, and administrative actions. WTO rules for government measures span the entire field of public health, including inter alia:

•surveillance and control of infectious disease

•regulation of hazardous products

•control of environmental health risks

•provision of food security and nutrition

•regulation of the health risks of biotechnology and emerging technologies

•provision of access to health services and essential medicines

•measures to prevent chronic disease.

Oh yeah, the WTO has a partner, a silent one judging by the lack of mention most everywhere in the current news stories.

Like I quoted from the New American a couple of days ago…

…Section 102 of the implementing legislation states: “No provision of the USMCA, nor the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance, which is inconsistent with any law of the United States, shall have effect.” However, the whole purpose of the bill is in fact to change U.S. law in order to be in compliance with the USMCA, once the bill is enacted into law. Section 102 of H.R. 5430 read, in part: “Nothing in this Act shall be construed … to amend or modify any law of the United States, or … to limit any authority conferred under any law of the United States, unless specifically provided for in this Act.”

Regarding State law, Section 102 goes on to state, “No State law, or the application thereof, may be declared invalid as to any person or circumstance on the ground that the provision or application is inconsistent with the USMCA, except in an action brought by the United States for the purpose of declaring such law or application invalid.”

In other words, this empowers the federal government to sue states to overturn their laws that conflict with the USMCA. Turning federalism upside down, this language would virtually transform the federal government into an enforcer against the States on behalf of the regional integration scheme…

Again, Donald Trump is not going to be our President forever nor are the democrats going to go away.

To reinforce that observation, here’s something from a very recent e-mail about the willingness of the wealthy to push a leftist agenda. Take note of the observations within.

https://capitalresearch.org/article/soros-aims-to-transform-the-justice-system-by-funding-da-races/?blm_aid=49345537

They have been pushing their agenda for quite a while. https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.ROSENWALDJ

Somebody Has To Ask

While the non-impeachment closed in a cloud of sophomoric democrat UNcertainty-based humour, few people were left glued to C-Span to witness the follow-on attack by the globalist pawns, united as always when they are called to rally ’round their bosses.

From https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/34391-house-of-representatives-passes-usmca-integration-scheme

On Thursday, December 19, 2019, by a vote of 385 Yeas to 41 Nays, the House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act (H.R. 5430) to approve and implement the USMCA regional integration scheme.

Of those who voted against the sovereignty-crushing regional merger scheme, Representative Justin Amash (I-Mich.) tweeted earlier on Thursday:

President Trump on trade deals:

NAFTA: “the worst Trade Deal ever made”

TPP: “even worse” than NAFTA

USMCA (mostly NAFTA with elements of TPP): “the best and most important trade deal ever made”
— Justin Amash (@justinamash) December 19, 2019

Sound like piling on to you? It is. It’s piling on a mostly UNaware American people.

There are rules laid out in that USMCA scheme that stink of tyranny. Trump isn’t going to be president forever but it doesn’t look like he’s gonna ‘lock them up’, either; you go to the New American link and soon enough the inside of your monitor screen is gonna get wet with democrat drool. You read some of the things they have to say about the likelihood of cutting off our balls.

Section 102 of the implementing legislation states: “No provision of the USMCA, nor the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance, which is inconsistent with any law of the United States, shall have effect.” However, the whole purpose of the bill is in fact to change U.S. law in order to be in compliance with the USMCA, once the bill is enacted into law. Section 102 of H.R. 5430 read, in part: “Nothing in this Act shall be construed … to amend or modify any law of the United States, or … to limit any authority conferred under any law of the United States, unless specifically provided for in this Act.” (Emphasis added.)

Regarding State law, Section 102 goes on to state, “No State law, or the application thereof, may be declared invalid as to any person or circumstance on the ground that the provision or application is inconsistent with the USMCA, except in an action brought by the United States for the purpose of declaring such law or application invalid.” (Emphasis added.)

In other words, this empowers the federal government to sue states to overturn their laws that conflict with the USMCA. Turning federalism upside down, this language would virtually transform the federal government into an enforcer against the States on behalf of the regional integration scheme…

World Trade Organization is not about gun control, you say? Maybe not yet but you ought to have an idea by now of who they are and what they do.

We won’t have to wonder too much longer about how the UN troops would gain entry into our world. This USMCA is rightly identified as a scheme, that’s for sure.

So let’s step away from the impeachment distraction for awhile and concentrate on providing guidance in huge and frequent measures to the Senate regarding adding some Second Amendment protection in any agreement they make with their globalist friends.

Infamy

It is only fitting that the status of the date, December 7th, in the words used by a drama queen democrat president to usher US into another world war, “…a date which will live in infamy…” would, in less than eighty years, be reduced in historical significance by the bi-partisan gas lighters of December 18, 2019 hiding behind a wall of naked lies as they hammer out a long chain of treacherous, fabricated accusations designed to destroy the peace and tranquility promised US by our Constitution and do the devil’s work in order to remove US from our place of world leadership and into a plebian existence controlled by world class criminals the likes of which we, the citizens, rose to battle against in the numerous and bloody conflicts political criminals encouraged throughout our past.

The Democrats own infamy now. They just reworked the phrase. They own it and they are the party that will live in infamy.

For however long they last, anyway.

My List of Obama’s Culpable Offenses

is not complete.

https://spectator.org/obamas-meddling-in-foreign-elections-six-examples/

https://thehill.com/opinion/katie-pavlich/323995-pavlich-failure-of-fast-and-furious

https://www.ocregister.com/2012/10/26/mark-steyn-benghazi-bungle-requires-act-of-urgent-political-hygiene/

https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2015/eirv42n21-20150522/67-73_4221.pdf

https://www.investors.com/why-is-un-using-islamist-group-to-resettle-syrian-refugees-in-the-us-/

Far Be It From Me…

to suggest to an expert in national security, a former Attorney General of Virginia and I’m sure, an all around well informed individual of the workings and capabilities of the Department of Justice that he might be missing something about Sanctuary cities.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/05/ken-cuccinelli-sanctuary-ms-13/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newslink&utm_term=members&utm_content=20191210212005.

Who knows? The angle I was looking for might have been edited out of the article and has nothing to do with Mr. Cuccinelli’s grasp of plata o plomo. While as the Virginia Attorney General, Cuccinelli’s access to information would be from the highest level; perhaps a picture like this one is not generally included in morning briefings.

My access to such information is stories out of newspapers. My understanding of the methods the Mexican cartels and criminal democrats in office share in doing their business comes from reading news accounts of political graft, bribery and corruption. The making and taking of payoffs is part of the ‘business’.

It doesn’t make it right and it has to be weeded out when discovered but as they used to say back in the hood, it’s the way of the world.

This sanctuary city bs is something else, though. In my mind it has always portended that we, the U.S. citizens, Americans, have been positioned over a trap door and no one we expected to get US out of the danger zone has a clue the danger exists. So I’m going to revise and repeat the following message. It’s from https://www.bucksafa11.org/2017/07/04/dominicans-bring-so-much-to-our-shores/

This story can lead many readers to conclude the business model described here is that the illicit drug trade https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rhode-island/articles/2017-04-13/3-brothers-arrested-in-fbi-drug-trafficking-sting is operating like a pharmaceutical manufacturer and the corner druggist. It’s not. It’s Mexican criminals employing Dominican criminals as their secure delivery service.

A brief look at that politically obscured chain of security within the realm of sanctuary city enhancement will help point out the real danger of sanctuary cities.

The cartels, like the Jesuits, worked out the smuggling routes long ago using the ‘escaping war and persecution’ and ‘doing jobs Americans won’t do anymore’ guilt bombs to hide behind. You will have to read the special report at the bottom to get a more complete understanding of what was going on twenty years ago that lead to the current peccadillo American people are trying to deal with that originates from the political deception driving the elitist’s agenda.

After smugglers establish their routes and get the guns/people/drugs/people successfully moving along those routes and unacceptable losses still occur from law enforcement interruptions, it’s time for the gangsters to introduce themselves to the politicians and work out a deal.

It’s not new.

From http://www.umich.edu/~eng217/student_projects/nkazmers/corrupt1.html

Chicago was a city where politicians and police were crooked, and eager to accept bribes. This corruption in the government system allowed organized crime to grow as it did, for any officials that stood in the way of the criminal activities could often be ‘bought out’. The temptation of bribery and the associated corruption innate to the government system at the time were taken advantage of by gangs of organized criminals to avoid arrest and prosecution. During the early 1900s, Chicago was the “easiest joint in the country in which to jump bond, as well as for staying out of jail altogether. The price commonly being whatever you have in your wallet. If the wallet is empty a fifty-cent cigar will usually do it” (Algren 1951, 17). Polticians (sic) could also be bought through bribery, which created the possibility for gangsters to team up with them to gain immunity from the law…

These days it’s called plato o plomo. That translates to silver or lead. Pleasure or pain. It’s another life’s choice. If a deal is reached things get easier for the gangsters and a tad worrisome for the politician. If the politician has a conscience.

Then one day somebody, inspired by how the third world cuts to the chase, comes up with a new idea for transforming this bastion of freedom. Replacing Constitutional law with civil rights that do not exist, sanctuary cities were created.

The concept, keep crime local ignore the federal, works in the third world; but for the U.S. it needed a pretty name the liberal minded can embrace, hence sanctuary cities.

What it does is it prohibits the local police from contacting the Feds when they come in contact with an invader who is not engaging in a felony or has no felony conviction at the time of contact. What it means is the rule of law takes another hit from the brick in the sanctimonious pillow.

One problem with that for those of US who rely on the rule of law to protect civilization is false identities proliferate. Getting a false ID is inexpensive and available at flea markets everywhere. Not to mention the cartels have the means and wherewithal, if necessary, to insure the squeaky clean versions for their mules living in and working out of a sanctuary city.

Is Providence, Rhode Island a sanctuary city? Check.

Boston, MA.? Check.

Hartford, CT.? Check

What about New York? Yo, you kidding me? Fuhgeddaboudit. At least until DiBlasio took over.

This drug war is beginning to look like an A-Team rerun.

The cartels seem to have the northeast sewed up tighter than the stitching on a new baseball. Evidence exists it is unlikely the rest of the country will escape their influence. Especially under democrat control.

Before you start pointing out President Trump is running the show now and things are going to be different from here on in, read these moldy oldies from 1999 and 2011 and ponder the probabilities.

And don’t think this is just about money. Drug deaths are being recorded at record levels throughout our Nation. It’s being called the opioid epidemic. Read on and start thinking of it more properly as a war being waged against US…

I’ve never heard the terms plata o plomo and sanctuary cities mentioned together. It’s not been reported, as far as I know, that any republican member of congress, involved in congressional or senate hearings, has even mentioned the possibility of the cartels sharing millions of their dollars to ensure a reliably smooth business environment in a sanctuary city.

It is an accepted part of the cartel business culture and cost. The democrat mayors of failing cities whose tax base has been reportedly damaged by democrat tax burdens can have access to a new and unaccountable source of income. Operating an alleged sanctuary with a cartel’s assistance can go a long way in keeping those failing, over spent socialist skeletons propped up. What a selling point for the cartel’s.

Uh oh. It looks like the brotherhood of American mayors had a meeting recently and word’s gotten out. Mayors are ignoring their citizens and are clamoring for more diversity.

I’ll bet they’ll soon even introduce and pass weird taxes as a win/win money laundering operation.

Think about it.

How likely is it any republican official will ever address all the possibilities?