Regarding the address to the joint session of Congress by President Trump, I thought he did a great job expressing the citizens concerns and that 70+% favorable response to it proved he was still hitting the right buttons for US.
It did occur to me during the speech that we were getting a modern fireside chat; those FDR chats that worked so well to restore American’s faith in government despite the fact the citizens were getting sold a bill of goods by an invalid democrat intent on change and looking forward to war. President Trump, however, is looking forward to peace and we have to believe the Republican Party, this version of the Republican Party, is right there with him.
That wasn’t always the case , you’ll remember, with the Republican Party.
When I lived in Bucks county, Pennsylvania, in what used to be the Eighth district, the Republican In Name Only was Jim Greenwood. I wrote about him before, back when he was yearning to join in the World Wide Parliament and drag US into it.
https://www.bucksafa11.org/2019/06/18/dear-president-trump/ has enough of Greenwood’s story in it for anyone interested in validating his treacherous mendacity for themselves.
You can also read his globalist fairy tale at
An occasional ad in their newsletter…
March 2001 – Pocantico – Hudson Valley, New York GLOBE USA will be holding an international legislative conference to stratetgize how legislators from Europe, Japan and the US can work to address strong environmetal standards for all ECAs.
Not many may remember this but if it required a congressional vote to make it happen, he would have been in favor…
From https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2001/5447.htm
AWACs Deployed to the United States
Five NATO AWACs aircraft, one NATO Trainer Cargo Aircraft, and a detachment of 200 personnel arrived in the U.S. from Geilenkirchen, Germany, on October 9-10. The aircraft are based at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma, where they will operate with North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), helping to defend the continental United States in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks. The United States asked NATO to deploy the AWACs aircraft to assist in the NORAD mission, to allow other U.S. aircraft of this type to deploy elsewhere, and to share the burden of NORAD AWACs flights.
This deployment is part of NATO’s historic invocation of Article 5 of the NATO charter, which embodies the principle of collective defense: an attack on one is an attack on all. Personnel for this NATO detachment come from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, and the United States.
Requests for media interviews or media orientation flights on NATO or U.S. AWACs can be directed to NORAD Public Affairs, (719) 554-6889.
Released on October 18, 2001
https://globelegislators.org/about-globe/history/ is still active and if you didn’t notice, on page 3 of that archived GlobeUSA newsletter above, there was a clue to the identity of one the world’s future royal families…
A longtime a supporter of making policymakers aware of global trends and issues, Rockefeller approved a grant for GLOBE USA to highlight the changing role of national legislators as globalization and international institutions take traditionally national policy issues into the international arena…
Rockefellers have a dream and they intend to live it. It’s for the benefit of humanity, dammit; that alone deserves a look at how we’ll benefit from it. After all, it was US who paid and continues to pay for their beneficence.
They (John D Rockefeller jr and progeny) did gift the world with the US property the UN was built on and nineteen years prior to that he provided the building fund for the League of Nations
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/pierre-etienne-bourneuf-396529257_the-man-who-determined-the-site-of-the-headquarters-activity-7174443811924832257-9QPO and subsequently, as reported here https://press.un.org/en/2012/sgsm14498.doc.htm the family is held in a euro/third world type of esteem as is recognizable in Ban Ki-moon’s remarks of 2012:
I am honoured to be here on this eighty-fifth anniversary of the historic donation of John D. Rockefeller Jr. to the League of Nations Library. At the time, Mr. Rockefeller said he made the gift based on the conviction that “peace must finally be built on the foundation of well-informed public opinion.” This powerful statement rings true today.
It is fitting that we are naming this room after him. I thank the family for donating the portrait of John D. Rockefeller that was displayed at the Rockefeller Foundation for 65 years. In offering this generous gift, David Rockefeller said he hoped it would serve as a reminder of his father’s generosity – but more importantly his conviction that strong international organizations can help create a just, equitable and peaceful world.
The Rockefeller family has lived up to this conviction, providing immense support for the League of Nations and the United Nations over the years. The original donation to this library was particularly significant. Even today, the interest provides approximately $150,000 every biennium to this wonderful library. That makes it possible to care for its many priceless historical treasures, including a signed copy of the Treaty of Versailles and the Covenant of the League of Nations.
This Library is also the home of the original letter from Alfred Nobel announcing his intention to create the Nobel Prize and the Official Transfer of the League of Nations to the United Nations. This collection is so important that it is inscribed in UNESCO’s [United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization] Memory of the World Register.
This Library also safeguards more recent history, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, with original letters from Eleanor Roosevelt and René Cassin. I applaud the mission of this library to serve international understanding. I am deeply grateful to all the staff. You make an enormous contribution through your help for researchers and citizens who are interested in the United Nations’ history and work. I personally want to thank the Rockefeller family for my own office — and the entire United Nations campus on the East Side of Manhattan…
A few things about that speech…
Ki-moon’s claims about that collection of globalist documents being so important they are inscribed in the UNESCO Memory of the World Register got me to wondering: a) if it wasn’t for the USofA, Rockefeller’s opportunity to gain riches beyond anyone’s imagination, their (JDRjr and https://www.rbf.org/about/about-us/timeline progeny) value and impact could have been greatly diminished and b) if the Rockefeller’s didn’t have the cash to pony up, Europe as it exists today wouldn’t be recognizable; which raises this question, do they have a copy of our U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights inscribed in the memory of the world register? How about our Declaration of Independence? I know a copy of that exists. Of course, it’s a declaration of independence not a scheme to expand control for a few over many.
(N.B. The previous sentence was written weeks ago. This post has been a work in progress for that long; further on you will read an expanded interpretation of the previous line that will broaden the understanding of the phrase the Great Experiment that I think will reflect the reality of the current times.)
Their mention of The Treaty of Versailles and the Covenant of the League of Nations models their banter and bullchit style of governance.
Which Treaty of Versailles do the euro’s hold dear?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Versailles_(1756)?
1757? https://kronoskaf.com/syw/index.php/1757_-_Treaty_of_Versailles
1768? https://www.corsica-aventure.com/en/mag/discover-corsica/pasquale-paoli 1768?
Or is it1783? https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/ar/14313.htm
1787? https://academic.oup.com/book/34407/chapter-abstract/291875219?
How about https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs 1871?
There were two of them; the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armistice_of_Versailles Peace Treaty and the https://en.chateauversailles.fr/discover/history/key-dates/proclamation-german-empire-1871 Treaty of Peace.
A search for Covenant of the League of Nations yielded this from the U.S. State Department
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1919Parisv13/ch10subch1 while
https://www.britannica.com/topic/League-of-Nations/The-Covenant eventually produced this gem:
…When, in the last years of war, the Allied leaders began to make plans for the future international organization, they rejected any idea of reviving the Covenant.
The first meeting of the United Nations General Assembly was held in Westminster Central Hall, on 10 January 1946.[10] The Security Council met for the first time a week later, 17 January 1946, in Church House.[11]
https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/content/what-security-council when the Security Council held its first session on 17 January 1946 at Church House, Westminster, London.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_House,_Westminster
https://main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/content/what-security-council
Security council may:
When a complaint concerning a threat to peace is brought before it, the Council’s first action is usually to recommend that the parties try to reach agreement by peaceful means. The Council may:
- set forth principles for such an agreement;
- undertake investigation and mediation, in some cases;
- dispatch a mission;
- appoint special envoys; or
- request the Secretary-General to use his good offices to achieve a pacific settlement of the dispute.
When a dispute leads to hostilities, the Council’s primary concern is to bring them to an end as soon as possible. In that case, the Council may:
- issue ceasefire directives that can help prevent an escalation of the conflict;
- dispatch military observers or a peacekeeping force to help reduce tensions, separate opposing forces and establish a calm in which peaceful settlements may be sought.
Beyond this, the Council may opt for enforcement measures, including:
- economic sanctions, arms embargoes, financial penalties and restrictions, and travel bans;
- severance of diplomatic relations;
- blockade;
- or even collective military action.
A chief concern is to focus action on those responsible for the policies or practices condemned by the international community, while minimizing the impact of the measures taken on other parts of the population and economy.
Before we get further into the one world government wannabe’s nuts and bolts take a look at their cash cost to US.
From Pew https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/02/06/what-the-data-says-about-us-foreign-aid/
Between fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2023, annual aid spending ranged from $52.9 billion to $77.3 billion, adjusted for inflation.
The U.S. government is the single-largest aid donor in the world, according to the United Nations, accounting for more than 40% of all humanitarian aid the UN tracked in 2024.
The Pew research bar chart lists our contributions between 2001 and 2023.
https://usafacts.org/about-usafacts/ claims:
Researchers. Analysts. Statisticians. Designers. No politicians.
No one at USAFacts is trying to convince you of anything. The only opinion we have is that government data should be easier to access. Our entire mission is to provide you with facts about the United States that are rooted in data. We believe once you have the solid, unbiased numbers behind the issues you can make up your own mind.
https://usafacts.org/articles/which-countries-receive-the-most-aid-from-the-us/
The US has given out over $3.8 trillion in foreign aid (adjusted for inflation) since the end of World War II.
US foreign aid has varied over time due to various geopolitical circumstances, economic conditions, and national priorities. At its height in 1949, US foreign aid totaled nearly $100 billion, while it bottomed out at just under $25 billion in 1997, both after adjusting for inflation.
Between 1946 and 2022, the US has spent an average of $51.0 billion each year.
$51,000,000,000 x 76 years. You do the math. That was our wealth down the Rockefeller directed drain.
Rockefeller’s Council of Foreign Relations https://www.cfr.org/article/funding-united-nations-what-impact-do-us-contributions-have-un-agencies-and-programs admits that “Every member of the United Nations is required to contribute to the organization’s budget. The United States has been the largest donor since the body’s founding in 1945.”
…The United States today remains the largest donor to the United Nations. It contributed close to $13 billion in 2023, accounting for more than a quarter of funding for the body’s collective budget. Following President Donald Trump’s efforts to cut funding during his first term, President Joe Biden asserted the United Nations’ importance to U.S. foreign policy by restoring funding to several agencies that was paused by Trump…
Funding the UN: Assessed and Voluntary Contributions
The United Nations is a vast, complex intergovernmental organization. This chart is a simplified representation of the UN system, including its largest and most influential bodies.
The list is long. You should take advantage of the fact it’s there. It might come in handy as the subject of the UN’s impact on our freedom advances.
What compilation of waste would be complete without the name of Biden being mentioned https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/biden-sets-record-us-taxpayer-funding-unappreciative-un
And finally, the word from Cato https://www.cato.org/blog/us-funding-united-nations should encourage Trump critics to button their lips… out of embarrassment:
The Trump administration has cut foreign aid spending, including some UN activities. The administration has withdrawn the US from the WHO and the Human Rights Council and has extended the US funding ban of UNRWA. Additionally, the White House is reviewing US support of the UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Another mostly kept secret? https://unausa.org/
The United Nations Association of the USA (UNA-USA) is a movement of Americans dedicated to supporting the United Nations. With over 20,000 members (60% under the age of 26) and more than 200 chapters across the country, UNA-USA members are united in their commitment to global engagement and their belief that each of us can play a part in advancing the UN’s mission and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals.
Sounds like the members need a class or two in Detecting BS. Consider this a First Step type initiative
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Association_of_the_United_States_of_America
“UNA-USA members, which comprise the largest network of UN supporters in America, are champions of UN Peacekeeping and understand that fulfilling our financial obligations is essential to maintaining a strong U.S.-UN partnership,” said Rachel Bowen Pittman, Executive Director, United Nations Association of the USA. “We’re grateful to Representatives Jacobs, Kamlager-Dove, Phillips, Castro, and Jackson for co-leading the U.S. Commitment to Peacekeeping Act of 2023.”
“Our research and work in peacekeeping contexts has shown clearly that UN peacekeeping saves lives,” said Wendy MacClinchy, United Nations Director, Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC). “Peacekeepers protect civilians, including those most vulnerable to harm. They monitor and investigate human rights violations, prevent mass atrocities, support community early warning systems, and enable survivors of conflict-related sexual violence get access to justice, often amidst sustained armed conflict. Yet the United States has not reliably funded its share of peacekeeping. If passed, this bill would help the US meet its commitments and enable peacekeeping to remain effective and properly resourced, including through more agile operations, better community engagement, and preparing for peacekeeping transitions.”
UN peacekeeping saves lives? I doubt anybody but fools and traitors believe that.
https://afsa.org/why-peacekeeping-fails
…the Security Council has passed 75 resolutions reminding governments of their obligation to protect their own citizens. Of that number, 41 were directed at the five countries where protection and stabilization missions are now taking place. The R2P principle also holds that if the government fails to protect its own citizens, the international community may step in to do so. Because the governments of these countries are either unwilling or unable to provide such security, the peacekeepers are being asked to do so.
https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/facts-and-figures/facts-and-figures-women-peace-and-security
It appears women have a larger lens regarding peace and security and see things differently… a couple of examples:
The proportion of women killed in armed conflicts doubled in 2023 compared to the previous year. Sexual violence in conflict rose dramatically with UN-verified cases of conflict-related sexual violence soaring by 50 per cent to 3688 cases and the number of girls affected by grave violations in situations of armed conflict increased by 35 per cent.
…The 1995 Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action set a global target for equal political participation between men and women. However, nearly three decades later, gender equality in politics is still far off, and many conflict-affected countries are lagging.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_abuse_by_UN_peacekeepers
In 2015, the UN started disclosing more figures about thousands of allegations of forced sex with UN soldiers in exchange for material aid, of which hundreds involved minors…[7]
…UN troops in the Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and Central African Republic have been accused of sexual abuse of women, men, and often children…[8]
…In Haiti, between 2004 and 2007, at least 134 Sri Lankan peacekeepers operated a child sex ring involving at least 9 confirmed children. According to incident reports, they wanted both girls and boys as young as 12 for sex. “I did not even have breast”
So why are we in it?
Take your pick: https://journal.equinoxpub.com/IR/article/view/23218 Coercive rhetoric, https://studyfinds.org/brain-switch-ocd/? ,malfunctioning brain switch or
https://seek.rockefeller.edu/flipping-a-switch-inside-the-head/.
Do you know anybody who takes the UN seriously? If we were normally functioning adults capable of recognizing serious and purposely created failures in communication and recognized it as the threat to US it is we’d have been done with it long ago.