Every reptilian RINO’s favorite shape shifter, Grover Nordquist, contributed an opinion recently at https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/554629-biden-is-wrong-to-let-other-nations-seize-american-intellectual-property and if SloJoe isn’t aware of the “technology transfer concept” the king of the swamp picked the wrong figurehead.
Grover must have been diffusing the issue for them.
Seizing intellectual property otherwise known as “technology transfer concept” to intellectuals is a solid Rockefeller University belief and their #1 reason for supporting it is public good.
https://www.rockefeller.edu/technology-transfer/
Wondering about the meaning of ‘public good’ I headed over to https://thelawdictionary.org/social-good/ and learnt from the horse’s mouth:
An action that will result in a benefit being available to the general public.
An action that will result in a benefit being available to the general public as Samuel L Jackson would emphasize.
However, in the Twenty-First century New World Oder good remains, at best, relative. The real concern is who determines what’s available to the public.
Not that we ever recognized it was scraps we wuz served up, Resets, especially announced Resets always take a big, big, bite out of normal peoples normalcy; one family has always taken pride in contributing to the shaping of acceptable normalcy, the Rockefeller family.
Let’s back up here to examine some benefits we as a nation have enjoyed from Rockefeller largesse in the past… Constitutionally speaking.
A more perfect Union? https://americanprofile.com/articles/john-d-rockefeller-jr-donated-land-for-united-nations-headquarters/
The United Nations headquarters in New York City sits on 16 acres of land purchased with an $8 million donation made in 1946 by John D. Rockefeller Jr.
David Rockefeller, a longtime leader at Bilderberg conclaves, was even more explicit when addressing the 1991 meeting of the Bilderberg group. Rockefeller stated:
We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.
Establishing Justice? https://www.reuters.com/article/us-maryland-lawsuit-infections/johns-hopkins-bristol-myers-must-face-1-billion-syphilis-infections-suit-idUSKCN1OY1N3
… According to the complaint, several Hopkins and Rockefeller Foundation doctors were involved with the experiment, as were four executives from Bristol-Myers predecessors, Bristol Laboratories and the Squibb Institute…
… A Rockefeller Foundation spokesman said that the lawsuit had no merit, and that the nonprofit did not know about, design, fund or manage the experiment. Bristol-Myers spokesman Brian Castelli declined to comment…
Insuring Domestic Tranquility?
Helke Rausch (University of Freiburg) focuses on a particular group of public elite actors during the neutrality period: philanthropists in the fledgling Rockefeller Foundation.
The foundation’s officers, Rausch demonstrates, disregarded American neutrality and from the outbreak of the war in 1914 pleaded for entering into direct commitments in the European war zone. With the entry of the United States into war in early April 1917, Rockefeller officials and collaborators then became “combat” philanthropists, assisting the U.S. military by providing moral education and running campaigns to bolster the American alliance with France.
Rausch concludes that World War I served as the Rockefeller Foundation’s period of incubation, transforming it into a hallmark of the American twentieth century…
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229207268.pdf
…Wilson administration refused to be intimidated by the militant forces and the public seemed content with neutrality. Nonetheless, League spokesmen remained undaunted. In the face of presidential opposition and a recalcitrant Congress, the League began its own inquiry into national defense…
https://ia802605.us.archive.org/9/items/nationalsecurit00housgoog/nationalsecurit00housgoog.pdf pgs 24-25
Providing Common defense?
… It would not be wrong to define David Rockefeller as the first truly global banker,” says James Wolfensohn, the former World Bank president, who first met Rockefeller at Harvard at the end of the 1950s and who remained a close friend until David’s death in 2017. “In that respect, he was ahead of his time…”
… “David Rockefeller saw an opportunity to make an impact globally, which very few shared at the time,” says Bill Harrison, who became chief executive of Chase Manhattan in 1999 and subsequently of JPMorgan Chase in 2000…
… It is easy enough to identify the sources of Rockefeller’s internationalism. A cosmopolitan polyglot, he had travelled extensively as a young man, witnessing at first-hand the rise of Nazism on a series of trips to Europe between 1935 and 1937.
“Visiting Nazi Germany in the 1930s had a huge impact on my father,” says David Jr. “So did the time he spent in North Africa and then in Paris during the Second World War.”
That experience, twinned with the overseas trips he had already made with his parents in the 1920s and the influence of his tutors at the University of Chicago, imbued in Rockefeller a profound mistrust of the isolationism espoused by the America Firsters of the late 1930s and early 1940s…
Promoting general Welfare?
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/01/07/the-origin-of-education-and-mandatory-schooling/
“I don’t want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers.” – John D Rockefeller
“In our dream we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science. We are not to raise up among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply.” – Frederick T Gates
Securing Blessings to ourselves and our Posterity?
https://www.population-security.org/rockefeller/001_population_growth_and_the_american_future.htm
March 27, 1972
To the President and Congress of the United States:
I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.
After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems. We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.
The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and consequences of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.
To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.
Respectfully submitted for the Commission,
John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Chairman
Let’s get basic. How about the big three?
Life?
https://rockfound.rockarch.org/family-planning
Liberty?
https://fas.org/irp/offdocs/ict-review.pdf
Pursuit of Happiness?
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43817535
Foundations have been even more influential in the political culture
of state and local government. The Rockefeller, Sage, and Carnegie
Foundations were created during the heyday of Progressivism, and
became prime movers of the municipal reform movement. Exist
organizations, such as the National Municipal League (1894) were
increasingly supported and guided by foundations. Carnegie and Rock-
efeller financed the Bureau of Municipal Research of New York City,
founded in 1907. Organizations such as the National Planning Associa-
tion, the American Municipal Association, the American Public Welfare
Association, the National Association of Housing Officials, the Council
of State Governments, the Municipal Finance Officers Association, and
the Conferences of Mayors, Governors, and City Planners were initiated
and continue to be funded by foundations. These are “think tanks” and
also associations of elected officials and public administrators.The aca-
demic field of public administration itself was largely created during the
1920s and 1930s by the Rockefeller Foundation and its affiliates (the
Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial 1918-1928, and the Spelman
Fund, 1928-1949).
Among the institutional innovations promoted by foundations, the
“council-manager” form of local government is noteworthy. The “city
manager” reflects the idea that local government should be run like a
business; a manager hired by the city council would presumably carry
out its instructions and manage the staff, insulating city workers from
council politics. The concept was endorsed by the National Municipal
League as its “Model City Charter” beginning in 1915 and received rave
reviews in a 1940 Social Science Research Council report on its pro-
gress. Today, the manager form is promoted by the International City
Management Association, which receives major support from the Rock-
efeller Foundation. “[I]t became the orthodox ideal of the municipal
reformers” (Childs 1952: 151).
How can we pursuit happiness when they are leading US around by a ring in our nose?