https://1997-2001.state.gov/about_state/biography/rocha_manuel.html
The reason I ask is, as a matter of course, I looked up Manuel at https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v31/persons and just below where his name would be is David Rockefeller’s name and his connection to the State Department. Which was legitimate because he said it was, I guess. Made a nice puppet theater, I’ll bet.
Rockefeller, David, President and Chairman of the Executive Committee of Chase Manhattan Bank; Director of the Council on Foreign Relations; head of the Business Group for Latin America (from 1965 the Council for Latin America)
I did a quick scan of the list looking for other names of those who might not have had any government connections and it’s possible I missed them but I didn’t see any.
But the CFR membership roster link showed up in that search and by golly, lookeydere.
https://www.cfr.org/membership/roster
Roster – Council on Foreign Relations
State & Local Officials · Religion Leaders · Local … Manuel Rocha. David Rockefeller Jr. John D. Rockefeller IV. Nicholas Rockefeller. Sharon P. Rockefeller.
I just had to click. Manuel’s name was not on the current list but must have been at one time. You ought to see how many Rockefellers access the joint.
Are people still complaining about the deep state? They are going to have to start looking a bit more subterranean. Or even deeper. Way deeper.
Is the Council of Foreign relations part of the government? No.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations
Not to be confused with United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations or European Council on Foreign Relations.
…In the late 1930s, the Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation began contributing large amounts of money to the Council.[8] In 1938, they created various Committees on Foreign Relations, which later became governed by the American Committees on Foreign Relations in Washington, D.C., throughout the country, funded by a grant from the Carnegie Corporation. Influential men were to be chosen in a number of cities, and would then be brought together for discussions in their own communities as well as participating in an annual conference in New York. These local committees served to influence local leaders and shape public opinion to build support for the Council’s policies, while also acting as “useful listening posts” through which the Council and U.S. government could “sense the mood of the country”.[5]: 30–31
in 1939, and lasting for five years, the Council achieved much greater prominence within the government and the State Department, when it established the strictly confidential War and Peace Studies, funded entirely by the Rockefeller Foundation.[6]: 23 The secrecy surrounding this group was such that the Council members who were not involved in its deliberations were completely unaware of the study group’s existence.[6]: 26 It was divided into four functional topic groups: economic and financial; security and armaments; territorial; and political. The security and armaments group was headed by Allen Welsh Dulles, who later became a pivotal figure in the CIA’s predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). CFR ultimately produced 682 memoranda for the State Department, which were marked classified and circulated among the appropriate government departments…[6]: 23–26
This is aside from the Roche story but pertinent to the deception the American people have UNknowingly endured for most of the 20th Century…
https://www.bucksafa11.org/2022/09/13/a-funny-thing-happened-2/
https://www.bucksafa11.org/2021/05/26/responsibility-as-deception/
https://drclas.harvard.edu/cuba
From https://www.bucksafa11.org/2020/08/01/dont-cross-the-massas-or-you-gonna-die/
Was David Rockefeller’s 1973 trip to China coincidental to the Chinese government commencing the abortion program directed at unborn females after he left?
Was it only the U.S. Supreme Court participation in “an exercise of raw judicial power…” that made 1973 the year that ‘ma’ was changed to ‘maw’? Women, too, had a role in the propaganda victory…
…The UN Population Fund goes on to declare that the solution to sex-selective abortions is not to protect female babies from intentional violence, but to “tackl[e] the preference for sons through changes in social norms.”
Aborting the female half of population might be traced back to Asiatic logic but this developing eugenics story has me thinking the animal kingdom is being readied to follow a similar path although it makes little sense according to the intentions of the Rockefeller Foundation .
Perhaps the results of the cattle experiments are designed to please those of the political elite class not restricted by rules imposed on the rest of US. Those who would need the protein required to control a weakened and angry though diminishing rapidly crowd would enjoy a regular diet of prime beef, don’t you think?
It’s again time to examine the Rockefeller Foundation contributions to the development and strengthening of our National character and well-being based on the qualities we were once taught had been implanted, nay, infused in our National spirit in 1776 and we celebrate annually on July Fourth.
From https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/288636-we-are-grateful-to-the-washington-post-the-new-york
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years…It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
You’re probably familiar with that one. Do you remember the time Castro visited the U.N.?
An excerpt from *** Miguel A. Faria Jr., M.D., is editor-in-chief, Medical Sentinel of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, and author of “Vandals at the Gates of Medicine”(1995) and “Medical Warrior: Fighting Corporate Socialized Medicine” (1997). To reach him: P.O. Box 13648 Macon, Ga. 31208 (912) 757-9873 Fax (912) 757-9725 E-mail: hfaria@mindspring.com Websites: http://www.haciendapub.com and http://www.aapsonline.org offers further evidence of Rockefeller values.
In 1995, Castro visited the United States to address the United Nations during its 50th anniversary celebration. It was a visit that was quite telling, as divergent groups came out to embrace him and sing his praises.
He was the honored guest at the Rockefeller family estate in New York. Yet, because of peaceful but serious protests, the honorific invitation had to be moved to the prestigious Pratt House, the headquarters for the Council of Foreign Relations, on East 68th Street in Manhattan.
At that confab, he was met by retired Chase Manhattan Bank Chairman David Rockefeller and a fawning audience of internationalists.
Later, Castro visited and was feted and warmly received by real estate developer and publishing magnate Mortimer Zuckerman and other media moguls and opinion molders such as Barbara Walters, Peter Jennings, Mike Wallace and scores of other media personalities. Castro called them “the cream of the crop” and in return got a big hug and kiss from Diane Sawyer, the most beautiful of them all.
And finally, during that visit, he was also honored at Harlem’s Abyssinian Baptist Church. There, he was proudly surrounded by U.S. Reps. Nydia M. Velazquez, Charles Rangel and Jose Serrano – all New York Democrats and all members of the extreme left-wing House Progressive Caucus.
They are among the 58 U.S. representatives who belong to this group closely aligned to the Democratic Socialists of America, the U.S. affiliate of the Socialist Internationale, the proud heirs of the first Internationale in which Karl Marx participated over a century ago.
All the members of the Progressive Caucus are Democrats, except for Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who makes no pretenses and is a self-avowed socialist.
Interestingly, some of these leaders, particularly some of those who are also members of the Black Caucus, have blamed the CIA for pouring drugs into the streets of L.A. and other cities and killing black youth.
Yet they embrace Castro and his brother, Cuban Defense Minister Raul Castro, who has been implicated for using drugs as an instrument of war against the United States, as documented by Dr. Joseph Douglass in his book, “Red Cocaine.”
In 1993, a federal court in Miami indicted Raul Castro for drug trafficking. Neither Attorney General Janet Reno nor the Black Caucus has asked for his extradition.
In Harlem, Castro was cheered and applauded by the roaring crowd yelling, “Fidel, Fidel, Viva Cuba, Viva Cuba!” He was warmly bear-hugged by Rep. Rangel and told by the presiding church minister that he was one of the greatest leaders of the world and that they joined him in opposing the U.S. blockade. Then the noted cleric consecrated Castro: “God bless you,” he said, although Castro is an atheist and Cuba officially is an atheist state where the faithful are persecuted.
To this topsy-turvy insanity, my understanding for this admiration for Castro and his regime can only come from Scripture in Romans 1:22-25: “Professing to be wise, they became fools who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator.”