If We Hear Lies We Must Scrutinize

I’m having a problem framing a response to your opening remarks. I spent much energy and time condemning the Muslim Brotherhood, especially during the Obama administration and I don’t want those bona fides threatened. However, I’ve learned over the years to stop with the knee jerk reactions. A lot of planning goes into causing knee jerks and they are usually planned by an UNfriendly.

https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-report-on-international-religious-freedom/israel-west-bank-and-gaza/west-bank-and-gaza/ hasn’t convinced me the zionist attitude is superior to the Palestinians in any way.

I’ve been scrutinizing Jewish behavior since 1967 when Israel attacked the USS Liberty. Come to think of it, there was very little US knee jerk reaction to that combined air and sea attack reported even when …Of a crew of 294 officers and men (including three civilians), the ship suffered thirty four (34) killed in action and one hundred seventy three (173) wounded in action. I was in the Marine Corps at the time of the attack and home on leave. My interest level was rather keen.

Another disturbing action was the ‘Dancing Israelis’ caught on video celebrating the burning Twin towers on 9/11 yet not a trace of the video remains on the internet as far as I can tell.

My point is Israel has violently attacked our Navy in international waters and danced to the death and destruction that took place in NYC on 9/11 and the American public reaction is muted; but when the shoe is on the other foot, the entire geographical realm of the western world is put under the Guardians of the Weaponized Sacred Sorrow microscope as they search for anyone who questions the zionist reactionaries in order to chastise them, embarrass them and hurt them; in Kanye West’s case, financially, knowing that with each measure of chastisement the organized Guardians of the Weaponized Sacred Sorrows will forge another link of guilt that you claim the average person understands and accepts that ‘reality’ as ‘simply politics’? I don’t understand that. Does ‘simply politics’ make their attacks acceptable?

Neither can I figure out why the ‘average’ person thinks Dom Giordano is afraid to talk about that ‘complicated reality’.The chastisement he’d face is, at the least, losing his job. Another liberty/security compromise, I’d say.

But the use of the phrase ‘simply politics’ represents the lackadaisical thinking that contributes to the power that is debilitating our nation and the everyday acceptance of the use of that phrase is just plain mind boggling.

It might sound like I live in a cave but I know enough about politicians to understand they are not capable of reshaping our national mind set on their own. Their major function is to make sure we don’t recognize them as the curtain the wizards are hiding behind.

Recently, a few nights ago, I learned of a phrase I do not ever remember hearing before: the Great Replacement.

It does sound like the Great Reset but the awareness of the Great Replacement goes way back in Jewish history unlike the modern Great Reset announced before the Covid manipulation.

The Guardians of the Weaponized Sacred Sorrows are heavily invested in the Great Replacement; the few links further on will lend credence to that.

At it’s foundation the Great Replacement is anti-semitic. According to the Guardians of the Weaponized Sacred Sorrows, anyway.

Now, if anyone was to go back a few years on my website they could interpret most of my concerns regarding the invasion as marking me as an anti-semite, a misogynist, anti-muslim, xenophobic and a few more that I’ve forgotten. Actually, you don’t have to go far back at all because all I am is an American speaking out more peacefully than Israel, that’s for sure, in defense of my Country. Not as violent as the IDF or Mossad methods but certainly in line with their concerns for their border security.

But when I say I’m not anti-semitic, according to the Michael Broschowitz explanation of the Great Replacement, that I said I’m not anti-semitic, means I am anti-semitic, which if you carry that kind of logic further I cannot claim a concern about the ongoing invasion of the United States because the Great Replacement explanation says ‘white’ people will use that to cover their anti-semitism therefore defending the U.S. Constitution Article IV Section 4 is anti-semitic because it states:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in the Union a Republic Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.

We’re in deep[er] trouble if we allow the Constitution to be made into a ‘woke’ document.

Since I’m airing out my dirty laundry let me be perfectly clear on the subject of right wing. Does having a deep and abiding belief in the founding documents of our Nation automatically qualify a person to be tagged with the phrase right wing? A phrase that started out sounding like an insinuated pejorative but more insidiously removes the Constitution from many a Constitutional based argument. Like the following excerpt below which demeans the First Amendment freedom of speech by including…

also vague enough to accommodate a spectrum of views from extreme to moderate, yet tucked within its three words are centuries’ worth of racist and white‑supremacist ideology…

From
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/08/a-deadly-ideology-how-the-great-replacement-theory-went-mainstream

So where did the great replacement theory come from – and how did it become so prevalent?
It is not a new concept or a fringe concern. Rather, it is a fringe concern and a mainstream one – espoused by “lone wolf” mass shooters and prominent politicians. According to a recent YouGov poll, 61% of Trump voters and 53% of Fox News viewers believe it is true.
The name could be one factor. Neither overtly offensive nor racist, it has the ring of a respected academic proposition and slips easily into mainstream discourse. It is also vague enough to accommodate a spectrum of views from extreme to moderate, yet tucked within its three words are centuries’ worth of racist and white‑supremacist ideology…

..Prof Matthew Feldman, a writer and specialist on rightwing extremism, explains that there are two versions of the theory. “One, we might call it ‘great replacement lite’, is saying: ‘There’s a huge demographic shift and these people tend to vote Democrat in the US or Labour in the UK.’” Then there is what Feldman calls the “full-fat” version, which says: “‘This is a conspiracy organised by elites – they’re deliberately undermining white majorities.’
“Both of them are, in a sense, conspiracy theories, saying this isn’t just patterns of immigration and demographic change, but this is being engineered. But who is engineering it, and for what, is something the further fringes of the far right are all too keen to speculate on.”

More

https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/tags/michael-s-broschowitz-0

https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/academics/centers-initiatives/ctec/ctec-publications/robert-bowers-and-risk-misdefining

https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/sites/www.middlebury.edu.institute/files/2023-03/Holy%20Hate-2-merged.pdf?

We’re entering into the early story of Eugenics next where we’ll read a little about the role Rockefeller jr played in funding it.

https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5263&context=etd

Rockefeller Jr donated big money to eugenics to both pre-WW2 Germany and the U.S. Is he to be considered anti-semitic? Or is the Rock role just part of the Great Replacement conspiracy yet to be played out with a surprise ending?

“https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/margaret-sanger-and-the-cult-of-racism/

Margaret Sanger married a Jewish man but allegedly aborted a lot of Jewish babies. Would she be anti-semitic?

Any regular visitor to bucksafa1.org will know the Rockefeller name and Rockefeller Foundation is targeted mainly for their disregard for the U.S. Constitution based protections for citizens. Never once were they thought to be Jewish; they were solid Baptist until Jr. went buddhist as he fell under the allure of China.

It was their family values that drew rancor…
https://www.bucksafa11.org/2020/09/10/a-short-review/

and
https://www.bucksafa11.org/2020/06/27/science-of-coercion-copyright-1994-how-its-done/

and
https://www.bucksafa11.org/2020/05/01/recognizing-the-malevolent-intent-of-the-global-elite/

and

https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/development-co-operation-report-2021_1b3dc767-en

and
https://www.bucksafa11.org/2021/06/21/timely-arrivals/

and
https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/initiative/data-org/ leads their readers to the land of no rules just rights in Data World’s next stop…

https://data.org/news/our-opportunity-to-make-the-rules-in-a-new-data-driven-world/

And my last example of where the power lies is intended for all the empowered abortion activists who believed they made the murderous difference

https://www.bucksafa11.org/2022/03/02/smell-the-sulfur/

To the President and Congress of the United States:

I have the honor to transmit for your consideration the Final Report, containing the findings and recommendations, of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, pursuant to Sec. 8, PL 91-213.

After two years of concentrated effort, we have concluded that, in the long run, no substantial benefits will result from further growth of the Nation’s population, rather that the gradual stabilization of our population through voluntary means would contribute significantly to the Nation’s ability to solve its problems.We have looked for, and have not found, any convincing economic argument for continued population growth. The health of our country does not depend on it, nor does the vitality of business nor the welfare of the average person.

The recommendations offered by this Commission are directed towards increasing public knowledge of the causes and consequences of population change, facilitating and guiding the processes of population movement, maximizing information about human reproduction and its consequences for the family, and enabling individuals to avoid unwanted fertility.

To these ends we offer this report in the hope that our findings and recommendations will stimulate serious consideration of an issue that is of great consequence to present and future generations.

Respectfully submitted for the Commission,

John D. Rockefeller 3rd
Chairman

Abort our future then bring in needed workers from the Third World? Sounds like what they mock in their Great Replacement conspiracy theory application.

You should read the information Michael Broschowitz is selling.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *