on Monday… Tuesday… Wednesday…Thursday
I came across a couple of stories about doctors being persecuted for their science based concern for their patients that I thought required some context.
What started this surge of interest was a link to a story about a Florida doctor at https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/florida-doctor-reinstated-after-losing-board-certification-for-criticizing-covid-19-vaccines-5480957. I didn’t read the epoch times account because I usually don’t want to give up my email address just to read a story I can find elsewhere.
Guess what. The only other place that made mention of that story (and using the epoch times as their reference) was https://ground.news/article/florida-doctor-reinstated-after-losing-board-certification-for-criticizing-covid-19-vaccines and they included this warning:
Read with caution – this story is only being covered by one news source that has a ‘low factuality’ rating, which means the outlet has a history of poor reporting practices. Learn more about factuality ratings here.
Factuality ratings? I got yer factuality ratings right here; and they want us to believe we live free? We live in a democracy is where we live and democracies aren’t free. Our Republic was but we, without being notified, were shifted into a slave state democracy and until that’s recognized we’re doomed; and recognition won’t happen until the blinders are removed from peoples eyes and Jesus is the only one who can remove them. The thing is, you have to seriously ask him to do that and it appears most folks are quite comfortable wearing those blinders.
Another story was weaved into the search returns; it’s about a Dr.Sherri Tenpenny, DO. You’re likely familiar with her predicament
https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/features/105864 After reading the account of the Ohio medical establishments regimented attack on the 1st Amendment protection afforded all Americans I read through the comments where I was shocked by the ignorance freely admitted by the commenters, some openly displaying their connections to ‘science’.
Which only provided me the entre to shed some light on that which we are allegedly soon to be forbidden to do… ask questions. Oh no, the scientists cry…another conspiracy theory!
OK, I’ll interrupt the covid story with this recent news that changes the conspiracy theory concept to straight up conspiracy:
https://www.un.org/pga/77/2023/08/28/letter-from-the-president-of-the-general-assembly-high-level-meeting-on-pandemic-prevention-preparedness-and-response-co-facilitators-letter-political-declaration-silence-procedure/ which, UNless you are a UN lackey you will understand little of and misunderstand everything else.
That’s why I’m including what they’re gobbledy-gooking about at https://www.un.org/pga/77/wp-content/uploads/sites/105/2023/06/Zero-draft-PPPR-Political-Declaration-5-June.pdf page 4, PP23; page 9 GLOBAL GOVERNANCE; page 10, OP27. Encourage fair, equitable and timely sharing of benefits of pathogens with pandemic potential..
WhateverTF that means, it ain’t civilized.
If you haven’t yet recognized they are acting like the U.S. no longer exists, you won’t be able to deny it after you read their Political Declaration, their wannabe new book of rules our traitors will be pushing in a couple of weeks.
But right now, it’s back to the ‘scientists’ commenting on MedpageToday cracking wise like sixth grade nerds.
Whether they were in the sixth grade or not, they all found it ridiculous that magnets could pass through a needle (guffaw). I was looking for a real scientist to point out the fact that magnetized graphene could easily pass through a needle.
Alas, alack; it didn’t happen even though it had been known for eight years when the wisecrackin’ commentators were mocking the facts.
There was a more recent announcement about graphene’s magnetic ability…
In 2022 Brown university put a spin on the magic angle they discovered that transformed graphene into a powerful ferromagnet
PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — When two sheets of the carbon nanomaterial graphene are stacked together at a particular angle with respect to each other, it gives rise to some fascinating physics. For instance, when this so-called “magic-angle graphene” is cooled to near absolute zero, it suddenly becomes a superconductor, meaning it conducts electricity with zero resistance.
Hmm. Wasn’t keeping the ‘vaccine’ frozen an issue back in the early days of vaxx when people were sticking spoons to their arms? Still wondering.
But Brown was not breaking new ground in 2022.
In 2015 https://www.sciencenews.org/article/graphenes-allure-becomes-magnetic published the magnetic angle five days after this paper was published.
While the 9/27/20 patent application for Nano Coronavirus Recombinant Vaccine Taking Graphene Oxide As Carrier did not mention the magnetized capabilities of graphene.(about a third of the way down… under the Disclosure of Invention heading) it did list the patents intent:
The invention aims to provide a coronavirus recombinant vaccine.
Another purpose of the invention is to provide a preparation method of the virus recombinant vaccine.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide the use of the recombinant vaccine of the virus.
So that the reader understands the nature and meaning of the word recombinant, according to https://www.britannica.com/science/recombinant-DNA-technology it is:
recombinant DNA, molecules of DNA from two different species that are inserted into a host organism to produce new genetic combinations that are of value to science, medicine, agriculture, and industry. Since the focus of all genetics is the gene, the fundamental goal of laboratory geneticists is to isolate, characterize, and manipulate genes.
Did you notice that humanity is not on the list of WHO gains the value of the new genetic combinations of recombinant DNA? Take that seriously because that is the basis of these modern replies that remove the technocrats from liability…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12477405/New-Zealand-Prime-Minister-Chris-Hipkins-claims-no-one-forced-Covid-vaccines-despite-bringing-mandates-minister.html
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/people-made-their-own-choices-nz-pm-insists-there-was-no-compulsory-vaccination/news-story/a1d355dca5063c5436a4ca6517bb3b7d
Please do not take britannica’s definition as the only one. Look it up yourself. There are many ways to say the same thing but I’ll bet most of you never heard that one on the evening news. I know I didn’t. It sounds too much like the original arguments against the mRNA vaccines, doesn’t it? Mustn’t have that.
One more suggestion. I’d start at the conclusion of that frontiersin site; and count the number of ‘mays’ used. It could make a person question the meaning of settled science.
Moving on.
While it is extremely unlikely that neither Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology Co Ltd., the applicant for the patent, nor https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer_announces_partnership_with_shanghai_institutes_for_biological_sciences_for_drug_discovery_activities their acknowledged partner, were UNaware of the graphene’s magnetic ability discovered five years prior to the patent application, no mention of it’s magnetic abilities were mentioned in that application.
Meanwhile, in the matter of graphene misinformation, Pfizer answers the question…
Is there graphene oxide in the COVID-19 vaccine?
No. Graphene oxide is not an ingredient in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. In a document submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) titled “Structural and Biophysical Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein (P2 S) as a Vaccine Antigen,” Pfizer indicated the use of graphene oxide during development phases to help determine the structure of the COVID-19 vaccine. However, graphene oxide it is not listed as nor has it been used as an ingredient in the vaccine itself.
Now, this is where misinformation, which our controllers use better than those of us trying to get to the truth of the matter, this is where the controller’s version of information, gets a little confusing. Currently, we are supposed to accept what all authority says as truthful despite the messages their actions and their history tell us.
Messages like this:
The first Covid19 diagnostic test was developed back in January 2020 reported that: “no quantified virus isolates are currently available.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31992387/
Abstract
Background: The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travelers does already occur.
Aim: We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available.
Methods: Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.
Do you remember when close only counted in horseshoes and hand grenades?
The FDA Performance Analysis from July 2020 further documents “No Virus Isolate Available” on p.40 https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen….“
Examples of other grey areas:
https://usrtk.org/covid-19-origins/fauci-nih-wuhan-coronaviruses/?mc_cid=a1586e2846
https://patents.google.com/patent/CN112220919A/en
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9283760/ Everything and I mean everything about medical patents and GO was not specifically mentioned AFAICS
https://nercn.lookchem.com/About.html Shanghai National Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology Co., Ltd.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7521125/ in 2016 China and U.S. were goombah deep
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWI0YiSmTKs MSNBC Brian Williams looks at covid conspiracy theories
Here’s four examples of a rather large chunk of confusing misinformation from https://academic.oup.com/nsr/article/9/10/nwac124/6618601? from Oxford University Press Copyright © 2023 China Science Publishing & Media Ltd. (Science Press)
NANOTECHNOLOGY FOR DETECTION OF SARS-COV-2
1)…Within weeks after the first published report of COVID-19, the full sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 genome had been determined, and it was shared globally, informing the development of vaccines and medicines…
Reply:
From https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download pg 41
The analytical sensitivity of the rRT-PCR assays contained in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-
nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel were determined in Limit of Detection studies. Since no
quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed
and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with
characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of
known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and
viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen. Samples were extracted using the QIAGEN EZ1
Advanced XL instrument and EZ1 DSP Virus Kit (Cat# 62724) and manually with the QIAGEN DSP Viral
RNA Mini Kit (Cat# 61904). Real-Time RT-PCR assays were performed using the Thermo Fisher Scientific
TaqPath™ 1-Step RT-qPCR Master Mix, CG (Cat# A15299) on the Applied Biosystems™ 7500 Fast Dx RealTime PCR Instrument according to the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel instructions for use.
Nanoparticle-based techniques for detection of SARS-CoV-2
2)…A range of nanoparticles, including colloidal gold nanoparticles, quantum dots (QDs), rare earth nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes and hybrid nanoparticles such as QD-doped mesoporous silica nanoparticles, can be used in immunoassays to detect various targets (Fig. 1a) [10,11]. The tests can be used with nasal swabs, throat swabs, sputum samples, saliva samples or serum. There are 49 US FDA-approved antigen diagnostic devices for COVID-19, as of 28 May 2022, under emergency-use authorizations. Most of these diagnostic devices are LFA that use colloidal gold nanoparticles or QDs…
Reply
Was the early presentation of the graphene-causes-metal-to-stick-to-my-body argument made to position the strong denial of graphene being mixed in the vaccine as the blanket acceptance that would shut down questions of possible graphene applications elsewhere, allowing the use of graphene to be sheltered in the don’t ask don’t tell zone while it is being used on the trusting guileless being tested?
NANOTECHNOLOGY AND COVID-19 VACCINES
3)… nanoparticles can also be used as adjuvants, to boost the overall efficiency of the immune response generated by vaccines. Adjuvants also reduce the required antigen dose [39]. Of the various COVID-19 vaccines in development, 10 candidate vaccines have used protein subunits in combination with a nanoparticle adjuvant (6 at preclinical and 4 at clinical testing stage)…
Reply
The grey area we’re supposed to take the controllers word on looks to have gotten somewhat darker in the vagueness of those few sentences. Are we supposed to look forward to graphene adjuvants or are they being used already?
Nanomaterials with direct anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity
4)Although SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted readily by droplets and aerosols, contact transmission is an important additional route, via contaminated inanimate surfaces and poor hand hygiene [50].The virus SARS-CoV-2 remains active on a range of surfaces, including glass, metal, wood and plastic, for up to several days [51]. As a result, there is interest in using antiviral nanomaterials [52,53] and nanoparticles that can carry antiviral agents [54]. Antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 has been shown for a number of nanoparticles, including silver [55], zinc oxide [56], cuprous oxide [57], silica, gold [58] and graphene oxide grafted with metal nanoparticles [59]. When used to coat personal protective equipment, the combination of graphene oxide with silver, iron, zinc and copper nanoparticles improves antiviral activity against both enveloped and non-enveloped viruses [59].
Reply
That sounds more like a warning intended to condition their subjects into an acceptance of a treatment for a virus(?) that has no natural isolate.
…So far, 10 vaccines have been granted emergency use listing (EUL) by the WHO (16 May 2022).
WHO didn’t give US orders when we were a Republic. We should remember that… and never forget this…
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12477405/New-Zealand-Prime-Minister-Chris-Hipkins-claims-no-one-forced-Covid-vaccines-despite-bringing-mandates-minister.html
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/people-made-their-own-choices-nz-pm-insists-there-was-no-compulsory-vaccination/news-story/a1d355dca5063c5436a4ca6517bb3b7d
Camel meet straw
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/highland-hospital-rochester-ny-attempted
https://aspr.hhs.gov/legal/PREPact/Pages/default.aspx
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57Ykv1D0qEE
