Rehashing old, valuable facts.
From https://monsantomafia.com/2018-11-06-mom-toxic-cancer-causing-glyphosate-herbicide-in-childrens-breakfast-cereals.html
…Shannon Watts is the face of Moms Demand Action, a progressive activist group that demands unconscionable restrictions on personal self defense. After children were massacred in the Newtown Connecticut school shooting in 2012, Shannon Watts took up the gun control mantle to limit self defense of law abiding citizens. Instead of calling for more armed protections to thwart future school shooters, Shannon Watts argues for more stripping away of gun rights!…
…From 1998 to 2001, Watts directed a team that managed crises for Monsanto and Bayer. The most current crisis for Monsanto is their court loss in California, a $290 million case that confirmed that Monsanto’s glyphosate-containing products cause cancer — and the corporation hid the fact for years. After defending Monsanto for three years, Watts was promoted to Director, Global Public and Corporate Affairs Company for Monsanto. Watts “provided corporate communications strategy and support” in support of Monsanto’s agricultural life sciences. The lawsuit found that Monsanto hid the cancer risks of glyphosate during the time Shannon Watts was defending Monsanto…
Even democrat underground can’t deny the dysfunctional scruples connection.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=139485
Reading what O’Rourke said tonight, “Yes, we’re going to take your AR-15’s” reminded me of the insidiousness of the democrats and Shannon Watts ices the image. That’s something to remember.
Something else to remember is the battle for freedom is not always fought on an open level battlefield and often deception determines the outcome. You should recognize by now deception is the progressive democrat/liberals/socialists middle name. If we can understand that, we should have tactics and strategy in place to deal with their lies effectively.
I’ve raised this subject before.
From https://www.bucksafa11.org/2018/10/13/pa-democrat-governor-signs-feel-good-republican-anti-rkba-law/
…until people affected by tragic events such as surviving victims or the family members of victims or witnesses to such violence show signs of emotional healing, their First Amendment right to free speech regarding the Second Amendment, specifically, be restricted to answering law enforcement investigators or court testimony.
When it comes to the ongoing effort to deny every American the protection of the Constitution because of the emotional distress of a few I say in response, let there be fair and equal treatment for all.
Until the emotionally traumatized by crime can prove they no longer have the will to attack the basis of our nation, the Constitution, their First Amendment right should be withdrawn in the same manner they want to whittle away the Second Amendment right based on, on many occasions, an accusation of a misdemeanor…
Think that is an overboard reaction?
Consider Shannon Watts’ impact on humanity; O’Rourke’s promise of an out-of-control power trip if elected and read https://legalinsurrection.com/2015/09/are-anti-gun-groups-encouraging-swatting-against-open-carriers/.
Then ponder the equal application of Constitutional restrictions to the emotionally distraught. Comparatively speaking and in a more sane arena, which constitutional restriction could be termed an ‘overboard reaction’?
