Two and a half weeks after President Donald J. Trump declared a National Emergency to address the crisis on our border, mainstream media outlets have dug into the numbers—and the personal stories—surrounding America’s broken immigration system.

  What they’ve found comes as a shock to many Americans who never knew the trauma felt by those living in the shadows—including both U.S. citizens and migrants alike:

“More than 76,000 migrants crossed the border without authorization in February, more than double the levels from the same period last year and approaching the largest numbers seen in any February in the last 12 years,” The New York Times reported today.  

On Sunday, The New York Times published firsthand accounts of “the hidden nightmare of sexual violence on the border,” citing President Trump’s quote that “one in three women are sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.”  

On February 15, after President Trump’s border announcement, CNN’s Jim Acosta spoke with an “angel mom” immigrant whose only son was murdered by a previously deported criminal alien. “President Trump is completely correct on this issue—we need to protect this country,” she told CNN.  

This morning, the Department of Homeland Security released staggering numbers that put these stories in context. American law enforcement officers are apprehending more than 2,000 aliens every day at our Southern border. All told, U.S. Border Patrol has apprehended over 268,000 individuals since the beginning of this fiscal year in October—a 97 percent increase from the previous year.

Democrat leaders are holding firm. “There is no crisis at the border,” the Democrat House Majority Leader insisted a little more than a week ago.

To their credit, however, more journalists are starting to simply tell the stories of what’s happening on our border—and letting Americans decide for themselves what they think about it.

These reports are welcome. The ongoing humanitarian and security disaster at our border shouldn’t be a partisan issue, and the heart-wrenching stories it causes shouldn’t be told only by conservative media. A modern, safe, and secure immigration system would be a bipartisan triumph that renews Americans’ faith in Washington.

The only thing standing in our way is the political will.

Our country is facing a growing emergency at the border.

Corroborating evidence

Oh, look… the easily manipulated strike again. Is Bensalem still loving the cartel? https://www.philly.com/news/pennsylvania/bensalem-heroin-bust-jose-nieves-velez-emanuel-rodrigues-santiagom-hamlet-bentacourt-pimentel-20190305.html Must be good for the local economy somehow.

Hey, Bensalem, why not call the local chamber of commerce and ask for assurance the pain won’t get too personal.

A three month old story. https://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/2018-customs-border-protection-biggest-busts-border-smuggling-drugs-502385332.html. I call that current.

..The organization formed as a result of the 2016 United States presidential election and has a stated goal of reforming the Democratic Party by running “a unified campaign to replace every corporate-backed member of Congress” and rebuild the Democratic Party from “scratch” starting in the 2018 congressional midterm elections.[5][6]…

That was from a Wikipedia look into the latest communist effort to put lipstick on the globalist pig that drags them through the sty they earnestly believe is theirs to control; at least until the speck they see themselves as disintegrates into particles of the void they believe awaits.

Sanders Hires Arturo Carmona of Presente.org for Latino Outreach

Updated Oct. 2, 2015, 5:15 PM EDT

By Suzanne Gamboa

From https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/sanders-hires-arturo-carmona-presente-org-latino-outreach-n437836

Democrat Bernie Sanders, who still faces a long road for recognition and support in the Latino community, has hired a Latino Outreach director for the campaign.

Sanders, a Vermont senator, hired Arturo Carmona, executive director of Presente.org, a Latino advocacy group based in Los Angeles. Carmona also will serve as Southwest political director. The group, which is largely an online group, is considered more left than other more established Latino organizations…

As an activist on civil rights, Carmona, 37, said he never saw himself joining a political campaign, but “when I saw the political campaign and Sen. Sanders calling for a political revolution and people from all walks of life joining this movement, I said ‘Hey, this is something I’ve seen that can make a difference.’ I decided to join because I see a great need,” he said…

From https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/23/us/politics/justice-democrats-ocasio-cortez.html

… “It takes movements like ours to push parties to prioritize what the base wants and what the values of the party are,” Mr. Shahid said. “That is the role of our movement, to give a policy vision for this country to a party that often lacks a clear policy vision.” …

…Mr. Shahid, Mr. McElwee and their allies argue that they do not need long-game patience. Ms. Ocasio-Cortez, Representative Rashida Tlaib of Michigan and Ms. Omar, all Justice Democrats candidates, have already pushed strong climate change measures, higher taxes on the wealthy and support for a Palestinian state into the mainstream debate surrounding Democratic ideals…

…“We can’t have a 15-year power-building strategy,” Mr. McElwee said. “We have to have power now. We have to have it next election.”...

From https://cis.org/Report/Immigration-Policy-and-Politics-Bernie-Sanders

…“Let me be very honest with you. I come from a state, the state of Vermont, [and] it’s a small state. There aren’t a lot of Latino people,” Sanders told reporters after speaking at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s annual Public Policy Conference. “What we are trying very, very hard to do — you are going to see us moving very aggressively in that area — is introduce myself to the Latino community. I will fight for every vote I can get in the Latino community.”14…

From their own video Before Alexandria Was Known As AOC, There Was A Movement That Recruited Her To Run

President Trump, what do you have to say about that?

“America will never be a socialist country.”

It looked as if even Nancy Pelosi approved the President there for a minute. Could it be the democrat organization is beginning to recognize it is in dire need of parental guidance?

Rick Moran asks in https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/02/state_power_now_being_used_to_force_parents_to_transgender_their_kids__or_else.html

…How have we descended so far down into the rabbit hole so quickly when there is no scientific evidence to buttress the arguments of transgender activists and their allies in the judicial system? How can parents be allowed to determine the gender of their child? How can they be punished for refusing to accept this nonsense?…

The problem with the answer he provides in his following paragraph is it is false and in it’s falsity it is too easy to accept. Does he really think LGBTQ activists have that kind of power? Or does he think we think they have that kind of power?

There is power involved but like every dark turn our Country takes the power behind the vile attack on the American family is the Democrat leadership.

The Clintons specifically in this case and it was preventable.

Back in the 1990’s there were some big stories… Princess Diana’s death, OJ and Y2K but none of them bigger than the on-fire financial market or the Clinton impeachment.

The not so funny thing about the impeachment was Clinton’s ratings. From https://news.gallup.com/poll/4609/presidential-job-approval-bill-clintons-high-ratings-midst.aspx

6.Bill Clinton’s average job approval rating for 1998 was 5.7 points above that of the previous year, 1997, which in turn was higher than that of any of the four years which preceded it.

The impeachment story should have left America with at least a sense of the Clinton’s criminal propensity which should have prompted a one and done term limit for them but by golly, general consensus was greedily looking the other way.

The U.S.A. re-elected the UNindicted crime family and the cost of that was heavier than anyone ever thought possible. People still vote democrat so they haven’t yet figured it out.

Maybe a comparison of how good and evil works will help those who hate President Trump and his supporters get a better understanding of what’s at risk.

Back on September 2, 1987 President Reagan issued Executive Order 12607 he titled “The Family”.

In it he outlined requirements to be met in order to ensure that the autonomy and rights of the family are considered in the formulation and implementation of policies by Executive departments and agencies. Those rules were:

(a) Does this action by government strengthen or erode the stability of the family and, particularly, the marital commitment?

(b) Does this action strengthen or erode the authority and rights of parents in the education, nurture, and supervision of their children?

(c) Does this action help the family perform its functions, or does it substitute governmental activity for the function?

(d) Does this action by government increase or decrease family earnings? Do the proposed benefits of this action justify the impact on the family budget?

(e) Can this activity be carried out by a lower level of government or by the family itself?

(f) What message, intended or otherwise, does this program send to the public concerning the status of the family?

(g) What message does it send to young people concerning the relationship between their behavior, their personal responsibility, and the norms of our society?

The last sentence of EO 12607 read, This Order is intended to improve the internal management of the Executive branch and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.

Almost ten years later, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order 13045 entitled, “Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks”.

In it he ordered:

Section 1. Policy.

1-101. A growing body of scientific knowledge demonstrates that children may suffer disproportionately from environmental health risks and safety risks. These risks arise because: children’s neurological immuno- logical, digestive, and other bodily systems are still developing; children eat more food, drink more fluids, and breathe more air in proportion to their body weight than adults; children’s size and weight may diminish their protection from standard safety features; and children’s behavior patterns may make them more susceptible to accidents because they are less able to protect themselves. Therefore, to the extent permitted by law and appropriate, and consistent with the agency’s mission, each Federal agency:

(a) shall make it a high priority to identify and assess environmental health risks and safety risks that may disproportionately affect children; and

(b) shall ensure that its policies, programs, activities, and standards address disproportionate risks to children that result from environmental health risks or safety risks.

1-102. Each independent regulatory agency is encouraged to participate in the implementation of this order and comply with its provisions.

Sec. 2. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply to this order.

2-201. “Federal agency” means any authority of the United States blah blah blah

2-202. “Covered regulatory action” means any substantive action in a rulemaking, initiated after the date of this order or blah blah blah

(a) be “economically significant” under Executive Order 12866 (a rulemaking that has an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or would adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, blah blah blah

(b) concern an environmental health risk or safety risk that an agency has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children.

2-203. “Environmental health risks and safety risks” mean risks to health or to safety that are attributable to products or substances that the child is likely to come in contact blah blah blah

Sec. 3. Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children.

3-301. There is hereby established the Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children (“Task Force”).

3-302. The Task Force will report to the President in consultation with the Domestic Policy Council, the National Science and Technology Council, the Council on Environmental Quality, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

3-303. Membership. The Task Force shall be composed of the:

(a) Secretary of Health and Human Services, who shall serve as a Co-Chair of the Council;

(b) Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, who shall serve as a Co-Chair of the Council;

(c) Secretary of Education;

(d) Secretary of Labor;

(e) Attorney General;

(f) Secretary of Energy;

(g) Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;

(h) Secretary of Agriculture;

(i) Secretary of Transportation;

(j) Director of the Office of Management and Budget;

(k) Chair of the Council on Environmental Quality;

(l) Chair of the Consumer Product Safety Commission;

(m) Assistant to the President for Economic Policy;

(n) Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy;

(o) Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy;

(p) Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers; and

(q) Such other officials of executive departments and agencies as the President may, from time to time, designate.

Members of the Task Force may delegate their responsibilities under this order to subordinates.

3-304. Functions. The Task Force shall recommend to the President Federal strategies for children’s environmental health and safety, within the limits of the Administration’s budget, to include the following elements:

(a) statements of principles, general policy,

(b) a coordinated research agenda for the Federal Government, including steps to implement the review of research databases blah blah blah

(c) recommendations for appropriate partnerships among Federal, State, local, and tribal governments blah blah blah

(d) proposals to enhance public outreach and communication to assist families in evaluating risks to children blah blah blah

(e) an identification of high-priority initiatives that the Federal Government has undertaken or will undertake in advancing protection of children’s blah blah blah

(f) a statement regarding the desirability of new legislation to fulfill or promote the purposes of this order.

3-305. The Task Force shall prepare a biennial report on research, data, or other information that would enhance our ability to understand, analyze, and respond to environmental health risks and safety risks to children. For purposes of this report, cabinet agencies and other agencies identified by the Task Force shall identify and specifically describe for the Task Force key data needs related to environmental health risks and safety risks to children that have arisen in the course of the agency’s programs and activities. The Task Force shall incorporate agency submissions into its report and ensure that this report is publicly available and widely disseminated. The Office of Science and Technology Policy and the National Science and Technology Council shall ensure that this report is fully considered in establishing research priorities.

3-306. The Task Force shall exist for a period of 4 years from the first meeting. At least 6 months prior to the expiration of that period, the member agencies shall assess the need for continuation of the Task Force or its functions, and make appropriate recommendations to the President.

Sec. 4. Research Coordination and Integration.

4-401. Within 6 months of the date of this order, the Task Force shall develop or direct to be developed a review of existing and planned data resources and a proposed plan for ensuring that researchers and Federal research agencies have access to information on all research conducted or funded by the Federal Government that is related to adverse health risks in children resulting from exposure to environmental health risks or safety risks. The National Science and Technology Council shall review the plan.

4-402. The plan shall promote the sharing of information on academic and private research. It shall include recommendations to encourage that such data, to the extent permitted by law, is available to the public, the scientific and academic communities, and all Federal agencies.

Sec. 5. Agency Environmental Health Risk or Safety Risk Regulations.

5-501. For each covered regulatory action submitted to OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review pursuant to Executive Order 12866, the issuing agency shall provide to OIRA the following information developed blah blah blah

(a) an evaluation of the environmental health or safety effects of the planned regulation on children; and

(b) an explanation of why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the agency.

5-502. In emergency situations, or when an agency is obligated by law to act more quickly than normal review procedures allow, the agency shall comply with the provisions of this section to the extent practicable. For those covered regulatory actions that are governed by a court-imposed or statutory deadline, the agency shall, to the extent practicable, schedule any rulemaking proceedings so as to permit sufficient time for completing the analysis required blah blah blah

The last line…

7-702. Executive Order 12606 of September 2, 1987 is revoked.

If you think the democrat party and their quisling republican cohorts have your best interests in mind, if you don’t understand why the global elite’s moles are taking a stand against a President who is defending the safety and well-being of the American people when they (the moles) never made an effort to stop the criminal Clinton Executive Order wars you ought to ask yourself how much deeper into Third World perdition you are willing to let them take you before you accept delivery of understanding.

Easy answers from hand wringing social media commentators are not providing a path out of the real danger we are facing. Not knowing how far down the rabbit hole we are is a terrible acknowledgement. Not knowing how we got there is a portent of disaster for a nation that is supposed to be free. For all the sacrifices Americans believe they made in defense of our Country we should be able to smell the tyranny the democrats are constantly working to replace our Republic with.

Do you think the tyranny is going to stop if they successfully overthrow the President?

If you are unable to see the difference between the words of Ronald Reagan and the out of the can totalitarian edict of the Clinton’s that replaced them you deserve what is coming. Hurry to get your place in any welcoming city in any sanctuary state you find most comfortable.

Your mind has already found a place in the Gulag of Fools.

How come you never blocked a democrat president’s state of emergency declaration?

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/senate-democrats-have-enough-republican-support-to-terminate-trumps-national-emergency/